Matt Sgarlata [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think often JCL will be used as you describe, but not always.
For example, let's say I am developing a component that monitors
database activity and monitors usage statistics (this is a hypothetical
example). The main purpose of this component is to
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not a huge issue for things like Lang which have no dependencies, but
for other things like Digester I think it would be a lot better if the
binary tar.gz contained the jars it depends on?
So when I download digester-1.6, the tar.gz contains jars for
Mmmmh
can you document more your platform and VM...
This test is based on freemem() and that makes, of course, the
assertion quite heuristic... if we all provide numbers for each
platforms, maybe we find a way to adjust the heuristic ?
Also, maybe it should be renamed as
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Mmmmh
can you document more your platform and VM...
Windows, Sun Java 1.4.2_06
This test is based on freemem() and that makes, of course, the
assertion quite heuristic... if we all provide numbers for each
platforms, maybe we find a way to adjust the heuristic ?
Also,
I'm -1 on including dependencies by default. I am +0 on the idea of creating a
separate binary download that includes the deps (e.g. look at Spring for an
example)
Cheers,
Rory
_
Sign up for eircom broadband now and get a free
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am trying to upload a huge file of 6Go, to do this, I comment part in
FileUploadBase.java :
/*
long requestSize = req.getContentLength();
if (requestSize == -1)
{
throw new UnknownSizeException(
the request was rejected because it's size is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32860.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
It looks to me as if, the from-stack attribute for the
call-param-rule element, used in the XML specification of Digester
rules is unnecessarily crippled.
It appears that the argument to from-stack is expected to be true
or false, and is converted to a boolean. That means that it is
oglueck 2004/12/28 09:11:57
Modified:httpclient project.xml
Log:
Fixed issue tracking URLs
Revision ChangesPath
1.53 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/httpclient/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS
oglueck 2004/12/28 09:11:59
Modified:httpclient Tag: HTTPCLIENT_2_0_BRANCH project.xml
Log:
Fixed issue tracking URLs
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.35.2.18 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/httpclient/project.xml
I recently proposed an addition to Struts that Martin Cooper suggested
might be a better fit for the Commons Servlet package, and I agreed with
him, so I'm posting it here. However, looking at the sandbox contents
I'm not sure the Servlet package is still being developed. Is it?
If so, I
I already hijacked the SessionSize piece for my own debug script (Thanks
Frank!!)
I would be +1 (non binding) for such an addition. But, as Frank mentioned,
I'm not sure where it would live either.
My $0.02
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:23:30 -0500, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:48:00 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not me. Doing this will lead to people having multiple copies of
various component jars lying around on their disks, and will
Your very welcome James! :)
I'm actually in agreement with Martin in that it probably does belong in
the Servlet package. I like the idea of it not being tied to Struts as
I originally intended, although I'd have no problem if either thing was.
Of course, I ultimately don't have a say (aside
Well, if it's something you want to see actively developed and released, the
invitation is still open to you at struts on sf.net. I and others have
released many items from there. Simply post the release to the lists of
your choice and watch the download meter. If there are people actually
ozeigermann2004/12/28 13:11:12
Modified:transaction/src/test/org/apache/commons/transaction/locking
GenericLockTest.java
Added: transaction/src/java/org/apache/commons/transaction/util
SequenceBarrier.java
Removed:
polx2004/12/28 13:21:01
Modified:jellyproject.xml
Log:
Disabling TestCoreMemoryLeak currently... but I'd really like to make it a
checked test... looks like Windows is the target OS where it needs to be
fixed.
paul
Revision ChangesPath
1.159 +3 -0
Le 28 déc. 04, à 10:13, Brett Porter a écrit :
can you document more your platform and VM...
Windows, Sun Java 1.4.2_06
If possible, I'd get a copy of your failure to help me fix it... I
think it's a good test that should prove the absence of leaking.
[...] Also, maybe it should be renamed as
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 06:40:16 PM:
I think often JCL will be used as you describe, but not always.
Not always is of less concern. Matt, the PRIMARY focus of JCL is as
Ceki described. There are no if/ands/buts about it. If you choose to use
it in any other fashion, you
Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/27/2004 05:31:23 PM:
At 2004-12-16 16:51:31, Richard Sitze wrote:
I do not advocate a fail-on-no-config or fail-on-ambiguous-config.
I advocate a *warn* or *error* on either, using the simple default
logger.
The warning will be visible on
Richard,
The commons-logging-impl.jar approach you suggested earlier will throw an
exception if impl is not available which should be perfectly fine because
if the user explicitly puts commons-logging-impl.jar in her classpath,
then it means that she wants impl around.
I quite like it.
It
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You mean like this method?
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester/commons-digester-1.6/docs/api/org/apache/commons/digester/Digester.html#addCallParam(java.lang.String,%20int,%20int)
Kris
Blake Meike wrote:
Hi,
It looks to me as if, the from-stack attribute for the
call-param-rule element,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Looks like you are correct. I've attached the patches.
Kris
Blake Meike wrote:
Hi,
It looks to me as if, the from-stack attribute for the
call-param-rule element, used in the XML specification of Digester
rules is unnecessarily crippled.
It appears that the argument to from-stack is expected to
Curse you and your valid points :)
Next step for me is to work out just how much of Commons is affected
by your points. If it's just a particular component, then we work
around it (ie don't put the things in the dist, same as the current
situation).
One positive is that if we manually place a
No problem - hopefully it remains attached.
Let me know if you need any more info. It was run using Maven 1.0.2 as
maven clean jar:install off the latest CVS. I didn't really change
anything since the last time I built it.
- Brett
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Le 28 déc. 04, à 10:13, Brett Porter a
scolebourne2004/12/28 15:13:04
Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder
ToStringStyle.java
lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/builder
BuilderTestSuite.java
lang RELEASE-NOTES.txt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31933.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32619.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32870.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32870.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32860.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30403.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24825.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32801.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32825.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31411.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28812.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32785.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31542.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32851.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26630.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30402.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31544.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31543.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
burton 2004/12/28 18:18:21
Modified:feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser
RSSFeedParser.java
feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/locate
AnchorParser.java EntityDecoder.java
Log:
Use the link if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32533.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Servlet's basically been inactive for a couple of years as there just
wasn't enough there to warrant a component. 2 methods in fact :)
When we broke up the [util] project (lang, io, codec, various others
were all spawned), the code was filed under servlet and left until
more could join it.
I'm
56 matches
Mail list logo
