[email] What no email?

2005-04-07 Thread Mark Lowe
Hello Someone just posted me off list asking why email isn't in this list? http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons.html Anyone have any ideas? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [email] What no email?

2005-04-07 Thread Dakota Jack
There is a programming style that is not exactly consistent with Xtreme Programming which might be called Fait Accompli which might explain this. ///;-) On Apr 7, 2005 12:00 AM, Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Someone just posted me off list asking why email isn't in this list?

Re: [email] What no email?

2005-04-07 Thread Dion Gillard
There hasn't been a release has there? On Apr 7, 2005 5:00 PM, Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Someone just posted me off list asking why email isn't in this list? http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons.html Anyone have any ideas? Mark

svn commit: r160399 - jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/maven.xml

2005-04-07 Thread roxspring
Author: roxspring Date: Thu Apr 7 03:13:56 2005 New Revision: 160399 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160399 Log: NOTICE file now included in distributions Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/maven.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/cli/trunk/maven.xml URL:

Re: [VOTE][CLI] 2.0 Release at last?

2005-04-07 Thread Rob Oxspring
Thanks for that, fixed now. Rob robert burrell donkin wrote: i think that the NOTICE file may be missing - robert On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 20:09 +0100, Rob Oxspring wrote: Hi all, CLI2 has been pretty stable and it hasn't had any code changes since the end of Feb. Its a ground up rewrite of 1.0

Re: [email] What no email?

2005-04-07 Thread Mark Lowe
No I dont think so, there was still some umming and arring on a few bits and pieces before it gets to its first release. I haven't been following that closely.. I'll point this guy to http://cvs.apache.org/repository/commons-email/jars/ Mark On Apr 7, 2005 10:11 AM, Dion Gillard [EMAIL

[CLI2] getting values

2005-04-07 Thread Torsten Curdt
The proposed release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~roxspring/cli/ Rob, I've been playing with the CLI2 stuff now. Great stuff! ...but something I found confusing Let's say I create my option like this: final Set set = new HashSet(); set.add(a1); set.add(a2);

[CLI2] quoting

2005-04-07 Thread Torsten Curdt
Torsten Curdt wrote: The proposed release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~roxspring/cli/ ...another thing: command --option1 -c -P --option2 currently CLI1 and CLI2 is treating this as if it were command --option1 -c -P --option2 which is not what I want. For me -c -P is a

Re: [net] FTP client date parsing: new format

2005-04-07 Thread Neeme Praks
It just refuses to list any files from the server. Or is there some way to get more information about the possible issue? I didn't see any logging statements in the code... Rgds, Neeme Steve Cohen wrote: I used the following configuration for parsing: configuration defaultDateFormatStr=-MM-dd

Re: [CLI2] quoting

2005-04-07 Thread Rob Oxspring
Torsten Curdt wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: The proposed release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~roxspring/cli/ ...another thing: command --option1 -c -P --option2 currently CLI1 and CLI2 is treating this as if it were command --option1 -c -P --option2 which is not what I want. For

Re: [CLI2] getting values

2005-04-07 Thread Rob Oxspring
Torsten Curdt wrote: The proposed release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~roxspring/cli/ Rob, I've been playing with the CLI2 stuff now. Great stuff! ...but something I found confusing Let's say I create my option like this: final Set set = new HashSet(); set.add(a1);

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34350] New: - [configuration] Declaring reloadable configurations in the configuration descriptor

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34350. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r160408 - in jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/FTPClientConfig.java test/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/FTPClientConfigTest.java test/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser/FTPTimestampParserImplTest.java

2005-04-07 Thread scohen
Author: scohen Date: Thu Apr 7 08:14:31 2005 New Revision: 160408 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160408 Log: Convert non-7bit ascii chars to unicode. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/FTPClientConfig.java

Re: [net] [ftp] [patch] FTPTimestampParserImplTest.java and FTPClientConfigTest.java

2005-04-07 Thread Steve Cohen
Neeme Praks wrote: ok, these new patches make the failures go away in a bit cleaner manner, by manipulating the default locale setting. Also, I noticed that your java sources are in some strange encoding. If I open those tests that use french letters in my Eclipse and save them then they

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34351] New: - Provides a Class.getPublicMethod which returns public invocable Method

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34351. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [net] FTP client date parsing: new format

2005-04-07 Thread Steve Cohen
OK. There are no logging statements because jakarta-commons-net has no dependencies on any particular logging package. Ant does. I assume this configuration thing is a part of a custom task or revised ftp task of your own design. That would be the place to put in logging. You could even put

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34352] New: - Provides a Class.getPublicMethod which returns public invocable Method

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34352] - Provides a Class.getPublicMethod which returns public invocable Method

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34351] - Provides a Class.getPublicMethod which returns public invocable Method

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34351. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34351] - Provides a Class.getPublicMethod which returns public invocable Method

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34351. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34351] - [lang] Provides a Class.getPublicMethod which returns public invocable Method

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34351. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [CLI2] quoting

2005-04-07 Thread Torsten Curdt
The problem here is that -c looks like an option. The simplest ways Yes, and reason why is because the shell that executes the vm will remove the So what I would get is command --option1 -c -P --option2 [--option1] [-c -P] [--option2] Now we *could* say that since there are obviously

[resources] was: Re: RESEND: RE: Load message resources from DB???

2005-04-07 Thread James Mitchell
Like many of the Jakarta Commons projects, Commons Resources was based, in part, from the initial work done in Struts and later copied over to commons with the intent to one day use that library. This is what was done for Beanutils, Digester, Validator, and more I'm sure. (Craig, correct me

Re: [resources][configuration] was: Re: RESEND: RE: Load message resources from DB???

2005-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi, I agree there is definitely room to mix [resources] and [configuration]. Actually I started working on Commons Configuration because I wanted a smart resource bundle for a Struts application supporting ${variable} interpolation and automatic reloading. I wrote a

Re: [resources] was: Re: RESEND: RE: Load message resources from DB???

2005-04-07 Thread Martin Cooper
On Apr 7, 2005 9:10 AM, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like many of the Jakarta Commons projects, Commons Resources was based, in part, from the initial work done in Struts and later copied over to commons with the intent to one day use that library. This is what was done for

Re: [resources] was: Re: RESEND: RE: Load message resources from DB???

2005-04-07 Thread Eric Pugh
As a big user of Configuration, I've thought that it would be quite useful in many places. The flexibility it adds is really useful. Configuration isn't specifically locale aware, however, we have discussed adding a ConfigurationLocaleAware decorator that would handle that. The Scarab

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34165] - [configuration] CommandLineConfiguration

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34165. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34263] - [configuration] Add a size() method to the Configuration interface

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34263] - [configuration] Add a size() method to the Configuration interface

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34353] New: - [configuration]Provide support for declaring and creating objects

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34263] - [configuration] Add a size() method to the Configuration interface

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34353] - [configuration] Provide support for declaring and creating objects

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34353. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [net] [ftp] [patch] FTPTimestampParserImplTest.java and FTPClientConfigTest.java

2005-04-07 Thread Neeme Praks
Ok, but my last patch didn't afffect that part at all. And it was very simple one, when compared to the original one. ;-) Steve Cohen wrote: Neeme Praks wrote: ok, these new patches make the failures go away in a bit cleaner manner, by manipulating the default locale setting. Also, I noticed

Re: [net] FTP client date parsing: new format

2005-04-07 Thread Neeme Praks
Steve Cohen wrote: I assume this configuration thing is a part of a custom task or revised ftp task of your own design. That would be the place to put in logging. You could even put in the stack trace. I already added some debug logging there, but this part seems to be working just fine. It

svn commit: r160442 - jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser/FTPTimestampParserImpl.java

2005-04-07 Thread scohen
Author: scohen Date: Thu Apr 7 12:33:02 2005 New Revision: 160442 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160442 Log: remove unneeded import statement Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser/FTPTimestampParserImpl.java Modified:

svn commit: r160443 - in jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/ftp: FTPClientConfigTest.java parser/FTPTimestampParserImplTest.java

2005-04-07 Thread scohen
Author: scohen Date: Thu Apr 7 12:33:51 2005 New Revision: 160443 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160443 Log: refactor tests to work properly in non-English locales per suggestions of N. Praks. Modified:

Re: [net] [ftp] [patch] FTPTimestampParserImplTest.java and FTPClientConfigTest.java

2005-04-07 Thread Steve Cohen
I have now checked in code that I think should resolve these issues, but you will have to be the test of that. I didn't use your exact patches but I think I understood the issues you reported and handled them. Please let me know if anything was missed. Steve Neeme Praks wrote: ok, these new

[Configuration] Question re-developer access

2005-04-07 Thread Jamie Guillemette
Hey guys bare with me a bit here I've been a java programmer for many years... and have always said I will eventually get involved in an open source project.. I opened up the configuration source.. and I'm finding many little tweaks that might be needed. What I'm wondering is whats the best

Re: Is there an Apache or java standard for expressing non-English String literals

2005-04-07 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 7 Apr 2005, at 02:09, Steve Cohen wrote: Neeme Praks wrote: Also, I noticed that your java sources are in some strange encoding. If I open those tests that use french letters in my Eclipse and save them then they become corrupt and will fail. My configuration assumes that all source files are

Re: [Configuration] Question re-developer access

2005-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Jamie, a good way to start getting involved in the project is to file a bug in Bugzilla for every problem you encounter, and attach a patch if you have a suggestion to fix the issue. Emmanuel Bourg Jamie Guillemette wrote: Hey guys bare with me a bit here I've been a java programmer for

Re: [Configuration] Question re-developer access

2005-04-07 Thread Jamie Guillemette
Thanks Emmanuel, After i enter the bugs in bugzilla with the patch.. who has access to apply my fixes... also.. what about issues that relate to design.. Thanks J. - Original Message - From: Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34360] New: - [PATCH] MVS is the operating system of this server. FTP Server is running on z/OS.

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34360. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34360] - [PATCH] MVS is the operating system of this server. FTP Server is running on z/OS.

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34360. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Configuration] Question re-developer access

2005-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Once you file the bug we will discuss the issue and your suggestions. Those likely to apply your changes are the active maintainers of Commons Configuration, currently that's Oliver Heger, Eric Pugh and myself. Emmanuel Bourg Jamie Guillemette wrote: Thanks Emmanuel, After i enter the bugs in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34362] New: - Save() feature of AbstractFileConfiguration create a new file instead of overwritten existing one.

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34362] - Save() feature of AbstractFileConfiguration create a new file instead of overwritten existing one.

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE][CLI] 2.0 Release at last?

2005-04-07 Thread robert burrell donkin
looks ok to me +1 - robert On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 11:14 +0100, Rob Oxspring wrote: Thanks for that, fixed now. Rob robert burrell donkin wrote: i think that the NOTICE file may be missing - robert On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 20:09 +0100, Rob Oxspring wrote: Hi all, CLI2 has

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34362] - [configuration] AbstractFileConfiguration.save() creates a new file instead of overwritting the existing one

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34360] - [PATCH] MVS is the operating system of this server. FTP Server is running on z/OS.

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34360. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34362] - [configuration] AbstractFileConfiguration.save() creates a new file instead of overwritting the existing one

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34362. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Is there an Apache or java standard for expressing non-English String literals

2005-04-07 Thread Steve Cohen
robert burrell donkin wrote: On 7 Apr 2005, at 02:09, Steve Cohen wrote: Neeme Praks wrote: Also, I noticed that your java sources are in some strange encoding. If I open those tests that use french letters in my Eclipse and save them then they become corrupt and will fail. My configuration

svn commit: r160490 - in jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/HttpMethodDirector.java java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/auth/AuthState.java test/org/apache/commons/httpclient/auth/TestNTLMAuth.java

2005-04-07 Thread olegk
Author: olegk Date: Thu Apr 7 16:03:43 2005 New Revision: 160490 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160490 Log: PR #34255 (Preemptive authentication causes NTLM auth scheme to fail) Contributed by Michael Becke Oleg Kalnichevski Reviewed by Ortwin Glck Modified:

svn commit: r160491 - jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt

2005-04-07 Thread olegk
Author: olegk Date: Thu Apr 7 16:06:26 2005 New Revision: 160491 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160491 Log: PR #34255 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34360] - [PATCH] MVS is the operating system of this server. FTP Server is running on z/OS.

2005-04-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34360. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.