DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35470.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35285.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35470.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
My vote would be to just remove it. There wasn't a huge amount of
interest and if I'll be the only community on something, it's much
easier for me to have it sitting in osjava. It's always available for
the ASF if anyone is ever interested.
Even easier would be to create a directory in svn
Hi!
There is one feature left I would like to add to VFS after fixing the
webdav stuff (yes Torsten, its your last bugzilla ticket). It looks like
he really need it now and so I will satisfy his wish.
But then I really will freeze VFS for its 1.0 release - nothing else
then bugfixing will
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-logging has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-logging has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Though I don't really have bandwidth to help with it, I am +1 on
moving forward with Interpolation being a motivation for the next
release.
On 6/23/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
Is anyone planning on working on text.Interpolation in the near future?
It seems like a
I'm willing to do some work on this. I'll need to see what's in lang at
the moment though...at least some of the code came originally from
Digester so I feel responsible for knocking it into shape for lang!
Cheers,
Simon
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 06:34 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
Though I don't
If the objects in the pool implement some sort of interface which your
client uses, you could make them return themselves to the pool. All you
would have to do is wrap them with a proxy (as suggested below) which
implements the client interface, but make the proxy timeout after a bit of
time,
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 10:20 +0200, Torsten Curdt wrote:
My vote would be to just remove it. There wasn't a huge amount of
interest and if I'll be the only community on something, it's much
easier for me to have it sitting in osjava. It's always available for
the ASF if anyone is ever
Well, we just need a decision ...maybe let's have a quick vote?
I think consensus has been reached that it should not be in the next
release. Other than that, I believe whoever is going to do the work gets
first choice of exactly how that is achieved!
ok
I think you should just go ahead
There is one feature left I would like to add to VFS after fixing the
webdav stuff (yes Torsten, its your last bugzilla ticket).
hurray, hurray :)
It looks like
he really need it now and so I will satisfy his wish.
thanks a lot!
But then I really will freeze VFS for its 1.0 release -
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 10:37 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
There is one feature left I would like to add to VFS after fixing the
webdav stuff (yes Torsten, its your last bugzilla ticket). It looks like
he really need it now and so I will satisfy his wish.
But then I really will
Hi all,
First, I want to congratulate to the release, good work.
Secondly, to add to the above topic, I see the change in cache behavior
(since the patch?!?). When calling a Tag a second time attributes not
specified will have values previously set, as mentioned by Brett.
First call:
I have a need for a FileFilterUtils.makeSVNAware() so I can just as well
give it a try while I'm at it. I prefer moving the find package away as
it'll be easier to find later on.
On 24.06.2005 13:21:15 Torsten Curdt wrote:
Well, we just need a decision ...maybe let's have a quick vote?
I
Since a bit earlier than the patch, indeed, caching has been activated
by default and caching disablement has been removed. This was needed at
least by some jelly:define tags, as far as I could tell.
Can you give more details ?
- Do you expect the setters to be called at every new run ?
-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35463.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jeremias
Date: Fri Jun 24 05:27:09 2005
New Revision: 201604
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=201604view=rev
Log:
Moved finder package away based on the discussions on the mailing list.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/io/branches/finder-reminder/
On 24.06.2005 13:21:15 Torsten Curdt wrote:
Well, we just need a decision ...maybe let's have a quick vote?
I think consensus has been reached that it should not be in the next
release. Other than that, I believe whoever is going to do the work gets
first choice of exactly how that
Author: jeremias
Date: Fri Jun 24 05:35:32 2005
New Revision: 201606
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=201606view=rev
Log:
Added a FileFilterUtils.makeSVNAware() taking the makeCVSAware() as a template.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35150.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35495.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35496.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: jeremias
Date: Fri Jun 24 06:05:04 2005
New Revision: 201611
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=201611view=rev
Log:
Fix a little style problem.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/io/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/io/FilenameUtils.java
Modified:
Author: jeremias
Date: Fri Jun 24 06:05:35 2005
New Revision: 201613
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=201613view=rev
Log:
Javadoc fixes only.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/io/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/io/filefilter/AndFileFilter.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35140.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Paul,
many thx for the quick answer.
In my case, yes I do expect the setters to be called at every new run. Setters
receiving an expression would solve my problem, or always specifying all
attributes, even empty ones (mylib:mytag attr1=foo attr2= /) but then
all scripts (and I have loads)
Which tag-class are you subclassing ?
paul
Le 24 juin 05, à 15:33, Kristofer Eriksson a écrit :
Hi Paul,
many thx for the quick answer.
In my case, yes I do expect the setters to be called at every new run.
Setters receiving an expression would solve my problem, or always
specifying all
Just TagSupport
-Original Message-
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 24. Juni 2005 16:26
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [jelly] SOLVED: Maven issue with Hans memory leak patch
Which tag-class are you subclassing ?
paul
Le 24 juin 05, à
Hi there,
have you tested the jca memory package with websphere 5 ?
I'm in throuble with WebSphere TM. In fact I'm not using memory
(map) package directly, instead a XAResource wrapper to
FileResourceManager. The websphere TM package throw
IllegalStateException when that wrapper is enlisted
Ok, done. I hope it is acceptable the way I've done it. If not, we can
always do something different with it. Isn't SVN cool? :-)
Cool, thanks!
Anything else to do?
cheers
--
Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I've already checked a few things today. Good would be short review of
the methods in FilenameUtils because that was the class we excluded from
the initial release because it wasn't good enough back then. I haven't
had a chance to look into all the work that has been done in there in
the meantime.
Author: ggregory
Date: Fri Jun 24 11:35:08 2005
New Revision: 201661
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=201661view=rev
Log:
Changed @since 2.1 to @since 2.2 since these files did not make it into 2.1.
Modified:
Hi all!
I'll try again to discuss it, that times with a more concrete plan.
First: Due to the nature of VFS we have a public API (the VFS API) and a
private API - the API used to talk to our dependencies.
I would like to outline a plan how to deal with release changes:
public API: As
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29140.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35140.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32144.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've already checked a few things today. Good would be short review of
the methods in FilenameUtils because that was the class we excluded from
the initial release because it wasn't good enough back then. I haven't
had a chance to look into all the work that has been
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35338.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This isn't supposed to work this way, I'm looking into it.
-Original Message-
From: Kristofer Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 9:34 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [jelly] SOLVED: Maven issue with Hans memory leak patch
Hi Paul,
many
My first reaction is that cross-posting is bad e-mail etiquette. My
second reaction is that users do not get votes. I think it would be
fine if you want to take a *poll* on the user list to see what people
think, post the results to the dev list, and perhaps follow up with a
vote on the dev list
44 matches
Mail list logo
