DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37404] - [configuration] AbstractFileConfiguration.getFile() returns incorrect file object

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Pool: comments requested for a new implementation

2005-11-08 Thread Sandy McArthur
In the past weeks I've been working on a new implementation for Pool that I'm calling a Composite Object Pool (COP). I'm at the point where I think I've implemented everything I think the pool should have and then some. I would like feedback on the code and if the response is favorable I'll submit

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37420] New: - Online JCL 1.0.4 API Javadoc missing

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37419] - Date Parse Validation

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37419] New: - Date Parse Validation

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [jci] c#

2005-11-08 Thread Brett Porter
Guys, Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around to it), I talked about merging plexus-compiler with JCI. plexus-compiler has a basic c# interface (as well as eclipse, javac, jikes). I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which seemed to be in agreeance at the t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37418] - [jci] we incorrect change groovy class name to a filename

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37418] New: - [jci] we incorrect change groovy class name to a filename

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [net] "class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0"

2005-11-08 Thread Steve Cohen
Mario Ivankovits wrote: For details: http://www.javaworld.com/javaqa/2003-05/02-qa-0523-version-p2.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wow, as long as I'm in

Re: [collections] any objections?

2005-11-08 Thread Stephen Colebourne
robert burrell donkin wrote: On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:39 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: the reported issues seem only to occur when synchronizedMap is used. has anyone looked for a pattern in JVM versions? No, not yet or tried to replicate using a multi-threaded test rig? Bugzilla contains a basic

[vfs][VOTE] release version 1.0

2005-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! After so many RCs I really think its time to take a break and release what we have now. VFS is stable and in daily use. Some enhancements waiting just too long for this release to get implemented for 1.1. As previously posted please find the RC6 at http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37398] - [IO] Online API docs for 1.0 point to 1.1 docs

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[ANNOUNCE][VFS] commons-vfs 1.0 RC6 available

2005-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! The commons vfs community is happy to announce the availability of commons-vfs 1.0 RC6. Please find the RC at http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs The site can be reviewed at http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs-1.0-RC6/site *) upgrade to jsch-0.1.23 *) removed non working method setLas

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35548] - [vfs] vfs_cache dir is being created in the current dir

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36392] - [VFS] Can't copy using tar:gz:http FileObject

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34499] - [vfs] Exception on getting childrens from a hidden ftp directory

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29469] - [vfs] selector, toolbox and ant packages

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33795] - [vfs] memory provider

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36158] - [VFS] classpath: provider, similar to res:, but across the entire classpath

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36157] - [VFS] post 1.0, add get rid of deprecation warnings in FTPClientWrapper.java against commons-net-1.4.0

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36047] - [vfs] Services

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34859] - [VFS] Synchronized copy

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r331915 - /jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/tags/vfs-1.0-RC6/

2005-11-08 Thread imario
Author: imario Date: Tue Nov 8 14:45:17 2005 New Revision: 331915 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331915&view=rev Log: RC6 Added: jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/tags/vfs-1.0-RC6/ - copied from r331914, jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/ -

svn commit: r331913 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk: RELEASE_NOTES.txt build.xml project.xml

2005-11-08 Thread imario
Author: imario Date: Tue Nov 8 14:34:41 2005 New Revision: 331913 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331913&view=rev Log: RC6 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES.txt jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/build.xml jakarta/commons/proper/vfs/trunk/project.xml Modi

Re: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Carlos Sanchez
SNAPSHOT is a reserved word used by maven. When you deploy an artifact whose version has the word SNAPSHOT it gets automatically deployed also as a dated version, eg. 1.0-SNAPSHOT gets deployed as 1.0-20051115.203021. About the javadoc dependency, the patch is wrong, shouldn't be commented. In the

Re: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/8/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > About adding SNAPSHOT the reason is the same as other people has > already given. I looked in the properties files and tried to guess the > right version which is currently in development, other people will > know better than me. The rule is i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37404] - [config] AbstractFileConfiguration.getFile() returns incorrect file object

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[jci] c#

2005-11-08 Thread Mark Proctor
Chinmay Nagarkar is going to donate a c# interface to Drools - http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=17469068&postID=112848674485482389 I've been requesting he make this work with JCI via IKVM. If this is possible, with some hard work I believe it could be, we might want to change JavaCompi

Re: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Carlos Sanchez
About adding SNAPSHOT the reason is the same as other people has already given. I looked in the properties files and tried to guess the right version which is currently in development, other people will know better than me. The rule is if last version released was 1.0 it should be 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37187] - [javaflow] JavaFlow/CForm/select-list crash

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37395] - [fileupload] Allow parsing requests of unknown length

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37409] - [jci] CompilerFactory

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37409] New: - [jci] CompilerFactory

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37296] - [jci] GroovyJavaCompiler assumes extensions end in ".java"

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37393] - [jci] AbstractCompilerTestCase hard codes .java but Groovy expects .groovy

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37393] - [jci] AbstractCompilerTestCase hard codes .java but Groovy expects .groovy

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37187] - [javaflow] JavaFlow/CForm/select-list crash

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37187] - JavaFlow/CForm/select-list crash

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37404] - AbstractFileConfiguration.getFile() returns incorrect file object

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [transaction] XAResource wrapper for commons transaction

2005-11-08 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
2005/11/8, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Oliver Zeigermann gmail.com> writes: > > > > 1. Commons transaction is not prepared for JNDI. > > > > Honestly, I have no idea what this is all about. Could you explain? > > Hello Oliver, > > to be honest I do neither know that much about it. My imp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37123] - [jci] compilation problems are not delegated to CompilationProblemHandler

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37137] - [jci] Remove utils package

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37296] - [jci] GroovyJavaCompiler assumes extensions end in ".java"

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37391] - [jci] add System.gc() to ReloadingClassLoaderTestCase tearDown()

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37296] - [jci] GroovyJavaCompiler assumes extensions end in ".java"

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37123] - [jci] compilation problems are not delegated to CompilationProblemHandler

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37394] - [jci] Groovy no longer allows null CompilerConfiguration

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r331845 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/jci/problems/CompilationProblemTestCase.java

2005-11-08 Thread tcurdt
Author: tcurdt Date: Tue Nov 8 09:00:25 2005 New Revision: 331845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331845&view=rev Log: pass in a configuration (thanks to Mark Proctor) Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/jci/problems/CompilationProblemTestCase.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37394] - [jci] Groovy no longer allows null CompilerConfiguration

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37393] - [jci] AbstractCompilerTestCase hard codes .java but Groovy expects .groovy

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37390] - [jci] implement removeResourceStore

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37390] - [jci] implement removeResourceStore

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r331842 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/ReloadingClassLoader.java

2005-11-08 Thread tcurdt
Author: tcurdt Date: Tue Nov 8 08:54:51 2005 New Revision: 331842 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331842&view=rev Log: implemented method (thanks to Mark Proctor) Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/ReloadingClassLoader.java Modified: jakarta

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37391] - [jci] add System.gc() to ReloadingClassLoaderTestCase tearDown()

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37401] - [net] allow listing of hidden files

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r331839 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers: AbstractJavaCompiler.java JavaCompiler.java eclipse/EclipseJavaCompiler.java groovy/GroovyJavaCom

2005-11-08 Thread tcurdt
Author: tcurdt Date: Tue Nov 8 08:33:30 2005 New Revision: 331839 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331839&view=rev Log: provide a classloader for the compiler Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/AbstractJavaCompiler.java jakarta/c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37404] New: - AbstractFileConfiguration.getFile() returns incorrect file object

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37395] - [fileupload] Allow parsing requests of unknown length

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [jci] patches

2005-11-08 Thread Torsten Curdt
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37394 Groovy no longer allows null CompilerConfiguration I'm also just writting a simple CompilerFactory class. Cool! Once that is done I'll weigh up either ripping jci into the Drools tree sans common-logging requirement or build an event

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[jci] patches

2005-11-08 Thread Mark Proctor
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37394 Groovy no longer allows null CompilerConfiguration I'm also just writting a simple CompilerFactory class. Once that is done I'll weigh up either ripping jci into the Drools tree sans common-logging requirement or build an event model inst

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [transaction] XAResource wrapper for commons transaction

2005-11-08 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Oliver Zeigermann gmail.com> writes: > > 1. Commons transaction is not prepared for JNDI. > > Honestly, I have no idea what this is all about. Could you explain? Hello Oliver, to be honest I do neither know that much about it. My impression was that most of the JTA transaction manager use JNDI

RE: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Dion, Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:28 PM: > On 11/8/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM: >> >>> Questions: >> >> As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a >> final version should never be ava

Re: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/8/05, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/8/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM: > > > > > Questions: > > > > As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a final > > version should never be available as l

[dbcp] Status of Bug 35591

2005-11-08 Thread Thomas Fischer
Hi, I just wondered what the status of the following bug is: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35591 Basically this bug prevents one to create serializable connections with connection checking and without auto commit for any oracle database. The problem is that setting the tr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37401] New: - [net] allow listing of hidden files

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [net] ftp and hidden files in directory listing

2005-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Steve Cohen wrote: What options do I have to issue a "LIST -a" instead of "LIST"? Or are you interesed in an patch which adds a method "FTPClient.setListHiddenFiles()"? Hmm. This is a new issue and should probably be logged as such. I wasn't aware that FTP under windows behaved that way. U

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-11-08 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-11-08 Thread Ted Husted
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

RE: [net] "class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0"

2005-11-08 Thread James Carman
>From the commons-net project.properties file: "maven.compile.target=1.4" So, for some reason it is specifically targeting 1.4. -Original Message- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:55 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [

Re: [net] "class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0"

2005-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
For details: http://www.javaworld.com/javaqa/2003-05/02-qa-0523-version-p2.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [net] "class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0"

2005-11-08 Thread Steve Cohen
Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! However, I'm not entirely sure how you are inferring that the problem here is 1.3 vs. 1.4. You may know something I don't. I'm not sure where the version 48.0 vs 47.0 is coming from. I've never seen that before. This happens if you compile with javac target=1.

Re: [net] ftp and hidden files in directory listing

2005-11-08 Thread Steve Cohen
Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! Here is what I got from an VFS user: I have one last quesion that I wanted to ask to one of the Commons Net developpers because it does not appears in the FAQ I read. Here it is : We are using the library to access a FTP server running under Windows and when we l

Re: [net] "class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0"

2005-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! However, I'm not entirely sure how you are inferring that the problem here is 1.3 vs. 1.4. You may know something I don't. I'm not sure where the version 48.0 vs 47.0 is coming from. I've never seen that before. This happens if you compile with javac target=1.4 but running it in an java

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [net] "class file has wrong version 48.0, should be 47.0"

2005-11-08 Thread Steve Cohen
Simon Kitching wrote: On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 06:03 -0800, fiji kalathil wrote: Hi, i am using commons-net-1.4.0.jar in my proj i am getting the followinf compilation error src/com/covad/ccbi/operations/InfBillingOps.java:5347: cannot access org.apache.commons.net.ftp.FTPClient [javac] b

[net] ftp and hidden files in directory listing

2005-11-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Here is what I got from an VFS user: I have one last quesion that I wanted to ask to one of the Commons Net developpers because it does not appears in the FAQ I read. Here it is : We are using the library to access a FTP server running under Windows and when we list the files in a director

Re: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Dion Gillard
On 11/8/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM: > > > Questions: > > As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a final > version should never be available as latest trunk revision. Such a version > may only be in the POM whe

RE: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM: > Questions: As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a final version should never be available as latest trunk revision. Such a version may only be in the POM when the release is cut and later immediately returned to a snapsho

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2005-11-08 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37398] New: - [IO] Online API docs for 1.0 point to 1.1 docs

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r331790 - /jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/

2005-11-08 Thread jmitchell
Author: jmitchell Date: Tue Nov 8 03:42:32 2005 New Revision: 331790 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331790&view=rev Log: Ignore eclipse project files and the maven build target Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/ (props changed) Propchange: jakarta/commons/proper/val

svn commit: r331789 - /jakarta/commons/proper/resources/trunk/

2005-11-08 Thread jmitchell
Author: jmitchell Date: Tue Nov 8 03:39:18 2005 New Revision: 331789 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331789&view=rev Log: Ignore eclipse and jcoverage junk Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/resources/trunk/ (props changed) Propchange: jakarta/commons/proper/resources/trunk/

Re: Maven build fixes affecting almost all projects

2005-11-08 Thread Dion Gillard
Questions: 1) The javadoc dependency in attributes/compiler/project.xml has been commented out. Why? 2) cli/project.xml has changed from current version 2.0 to 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Why? 3) codec/project.xml has changed from current version 1.3 to 1.4-SNAPSHOT. Why? 4) betwixt/project.xml has a change whi

BeanUtils: proposition for "controlled" copy of bean properties

2005-11-08 Thread Rodrigues Adelino
Hi, PROBLEM DESCRIPTION Today Commons BeanUtils offers the possibility to copy properties between 2 java beans: static void copyProperties(Object dest, Object orig) As the instrospection does not care about how the target variable was declared, calling such a method will copy more properties

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37395] New: - Allow parsing requests of unknown length

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37394] - [jci] Groovy no longer allows null CompilerConfiguration

2005-11-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

  1   2   >