Hello,
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've uploaded RC1 to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/.
please check and test the release candidate and report any mistakes or
problems.
Just to minor things:
- docs/api is empty, can be removed (docs/apidocs contains javadoc)
On 1/23/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commons validator serves two functions:
1) To provide validation routines
2) To provide a mini validation framework
I'd like to more clearly separate out these two aspects, so as a
On 1/23/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/06, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re the ORO dependency:
It can be avoided if we use the Java 1.4 java.util.regex package. It's
much faster than ORO in the testing I did a year ago. I would love to
drop the ORO
Ive come across the com.sun.* issue before. They are part of the JVM, just not
officially documented for public use. Usually, they are convenience classes
written by Sun programmes who develop the JDK. AFAIK, Sun says that you can use
them if you wish, but their use is not recommended, purely
Ive come across the com.sun.* issue before. They are part of the JVM, just not
officially documented for public use. Usually, they are convenience classes
written by Sun programmes who develop the JDK. AFAIK, Sun says that you can use
them if you wish, but their use is not recommended, purely
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[ ] JDK 1.4
[ ] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
I'm mainly interested in the impact of moving Commons Valdator a
minimum dependency of JDK 1.4 to use the RegExp support rather than
depending on ORO. However,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[ ] JDK 1.4
[X] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
commons-beanutils.jar commons-codec.jar
commons-digester.jarcommons-net.jar
commons-betwixt.jarcommons-collections.jar
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[ ] JDK 1.4
[X] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
I'm mainly interested in the impact of moving Commons Valdator a
minimum
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[ ] JDK 1.4
[X] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
I'm mainly interested in the impact of moving Commons Valdator a
minimum
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[X] JDK 1.4
[ ] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
Using the following...
beanutils
chain
digester
fileupload
io
logging
validator
Niall
Niall,
You are asking the developers list something that really would impact all of
the users of Validator. I don't know if I'd feel safe making a decision
based on what we say. There could be thousands (if not more) of users out
there using Validator on a 1.3 JVM. Who knows? With Struts
On 1/23/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[X] JDK 1.3
[X] JDK 1.4
[X] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
OJB uses (partly optional):
* beanutils
* betwixt
* collections
* dbcp
* digester
* lang
* logging
*
On 1/23/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall,
You are asking the developers list something that really would impact all of
the users of Validator. I don't know if I'd feel safe making a decision
based on what we say. There could be thousands (if not more) of users out
there
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Struts is probably your biggest contributor of users, so that's a good sign
for your 1.4 requirement. However, I would still be cautious. Not all
users subscribe to the mailing lists. I would doubt that it's a high
percentage at all. There has to be a standardized way for us to go about
these
I agree with the points you make - the only thing I could think of was
this poll, unless we decided a policy of staying with JDK 1.3 until
its so old it doesn't matter.
Niall
On 1/23/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Struts is probably your biggest contributor of users, so that's a good
James Carman wrote:
Struts is probably your biggest contributor of users, so that's a good sign
for your 1.4 requirement. However, I would still be cautious. Not all
users subscribe to the mailing lists. I would doubt that it's a high
percentage at all.
Even if all users aren't subscribed
On 1/23/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[X ] JDK 1.4
[ ] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
I'm mainly interested in the impact of moving Commons Valdator a
minimum dependency of JDK 1.4 to
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
On 1/23/06, Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Carman wrote:
Struts is probably your biggest contributor of users, so that's a good sign
for your 1.4 requirement. However, I would still be cautious. Not all
users subscribe to the mailing lists. I would doubt that it's a high
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Lang, collections, logging, configurations, io, id, i18n, codec, dbutils, dbcp,
digester, discovery
Niall Pemberton wrote on Monday, January 23, 2006 12:34 PM:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[x] JDK 1.4
[ ] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[X] JDK 1.3
[X] JDK 1.4
[X] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
lang, collections, configuration, io, codec, pool, dbcp, validator,
logging, digester, dbutils
I use Java 1.3 only for Struts
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[X] JDK 1.4
[ ] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:46 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[X] JDK 1.4
[ ] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[x] JDK 1.3
[x] JDK 1.4
[x] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
Although the project I use 1.3 for, I usually fork the commons classes to that project (since I
normally just needs 1 or 2).
I use
On 1/23/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What JDK version are you using?
-
[ ] JDK 1.2
[ ] JDK 1.3
[X] JDK 1.4
[X] JDK 1.5 (or JDK 5)
-
BeanUtils, Chain, CLI, Codec, Collections, DBCP, Digester, Discovery,
FileUpload, HttpClient, IO,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/17/06, J?rg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote on Monday, January 16, 2006 11:13 PM:
J?rg Schaible wrote:
The release plan is available now:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1.0ReleasePlan
Looks good,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 23/01/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW does anyone know a reliable way to convert unix-windoz file endings
for text file endings? (i know stephen prefers zip's to use windoz
format.)
Can't you use the Ant fixcrlf task with eol=dos or eol=crlf?
S.
Author: joehni
Date: Mon Jan 23 12:26:42 2006
New Revision: 371653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371653view=rev
Log:
Move unit tests of id generators from IdUtils to according TestCase (solves
also current Gump failure).
Modified:
Author: joehni
Date: Mon Jan 23 12:35:37 2006
New Revision: 371656
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371656view=rev
Log:
Ensure unchanged binary representation.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/id/test/AssertSerialization.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24941.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16038.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19781.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 01:06 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 19:22 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Jan 22 15:26:41 2006
New Revision: 371420
URL:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 19:57 +, sebb wrote:
On 23/01/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW does anyone know a reliable way to convert unix-windoz file endings
for text file endings? (i know stephen prefers zip's to use windoz
format.)
Can't you use the Ant fixcrlf
Niklas, Brett, Trygve all,
Things were stagnating a little bit end of last year. I am happy to
see that things are in motion again.
Last interesting initiative was Brett's idea to start with an API
sketch. I think it is a good start but it's only solving the start
Process feature. That's
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 20:40 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/22/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've uploaded RC1 to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/.
please check and test the release candidate and report any mistakes or
problems.
you'll probably
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:05 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've uploaded RC1 to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/.
please check and test the release candidate and report any mistakes or
problems.
Just to minor things:
-
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 22:07 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:05 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote:
Hello,
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i've uploaded RC1 to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/.
please check and test the release
On 1/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Folks -
Sincere apologies if this seems to be in the way of anyone doing the
real work. There are jars out there marked 1.1, and I'm not
comfortable with this. I'm aware of the httpd/struts/tomcat process,
but we need
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38309.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 1/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Mon Jan 23 08:12:55 2006
New Revision: 371566
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371566view=rev
Log:
Adding doap files for each component for the projects.apache.org site
snip/
Lets do the sandbox projects
Henri Yandell wrote:
Looks like you're in moderation there.
Yeah. I realized after I sent it that I have no right to post there.
I've tried subscribing, but unlike the other apache lists, approval does
not seem to come automatically. I'm still waiting for approval.
Looking at the Mail List
Rory Winston wrote:
Ive come across the com.sun.* issue before. They are part of the JVM, just not officially documented for public use. Usually, they are convenience classes written by Sun programmes who develop the JDK. AFAIK, Sun says that you can use them if you wish, but their use is not
On 1/23/06, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory Winston wrote:
Ive come across the com.sun.* issue before. They are part of the JVM, just
not officially documented for public use. Usually, they are convenience
classes written by Sun programmes who develop the JDK. AFAIK, Sun says
jerome lacoste wrote:
There's only one issue: backward compatibility. I have over 1000 lines
of code that use the former API. So if the switch could be not too
hard to do...
Use the IntelliJ Migration assistant :)
Seriously - I'd say here we should strive for biut not be constrained by
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
/*
* StreamHandlers are used for providing input,
* retriving the output. Also used for logging.
*/
StreamHandler getStreamHandler();
void setStreamHandler(StreamHandler streamHandler);
My only comments on these is that I don't see the point of the setters
in the
jerome lacoste wrote:
Exec was deemed to be an object that makes it easy to use the Executor
for simple use cases, while Executor was more flexible.
Ok. The names could be better :)
I'd rather have implementations then we add an interface in a later
version if we need a remote exec.
jerome lacoste wrote:
The refactoring ended up here:
http://moca.dynalias.com/~jerome/projects/exec2/
(Unfortunately it seems like I messed up apache access rights, but I
should make this code available tomorrow).
Let us know, I'll take a look. I don't think I ever saw this...
- decide
Niall,
I code to the 1.4 API but deploy on 1.5 when possible.
Moving off 1.3 is safe because:
1. 1.3 is not supported by Sun anymore.
2. Struts requires 1.4 and Validator is primarily used by Struts folks.
Sure there are some that use it standalone but the percentage of total
users is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37868.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Michael,
Michael Heuer wrote on Friday, January 20, 2006 7:40 PM:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Phil Steitz wrote:
I have started working on this. What I had in mind was just a simple
facility for creating composite identifiers created by concatenating
results of an array of generators. This
71 matches
Mail list logo
