Re: [exec] design goals, API sketch, etc.. next step?

2006-01-24 Thread jerome lacoste
On 1/24/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerome lacoste wrote: The refactoring ended up here: http://moca.dynalias.com/~jerome/projects/exec2/ (Unfortunately it seems like I messed up apache access rights, but I should make this code available tomorrow). Let us know, I'll

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-24 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

Re: [exec] vision for the library

2006-01-24 Thread jerome lacoste
On 1/24/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerome lacoste wrote: I'm big on interfaces for defining and maintaining a simple public contract of the API, They help to some extent, but if you are going to use interface just to define your public contract, I think it might be an overuse.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38328] - commons-net telnet client not working well with Zirion Power Controller Model PSS-108MA

2006-01-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38328. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

svn commit: r371924 - in /jakarta/commons/proper: attributes/trunk/ beanutils/trunk/ betwixt/trunk/ chain/trunk/ cli/trunk/ codec/trunk/ collections/trunk/ configuration/trunk/ daemon/trunk/ dbcp/trun

2006-01-24 Thread bayard
Author: bayard Date: Tue Jan 24 06:29:48 2006 New Revision: 371924 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371924view=rev Log: fixing pmc from name to url Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/attributes/trunk/doap_attributes.rdf jakarta/commons/proper/beanutils/trunk/doap_beanutils.rdf

MultiHashMap modified..

2006-01-24 Thread Robert Ribnitz
Hello List, for a project of ours, which uses the Apache Commons collections, I need to make those runnable in a .NET/J# context. I have therefore Modified MuliHashMap. I have added a private Method in the outer class, that can be referenced by the inner classes (because the J# compiler does not

doap maven project descriptor [was Re: svn commit: r371566]

2006-01-24 Thread Niall Pemberton
Theres quite a bit of overlap between whats in maven's project.xml and whats in this doap format - seems a shame to have to have it in two places. Maybe a maven doap plugin would be a good idea? Niall - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

svn commit: r371967 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/guide.xml

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 09:55:07 2006 New Revision: 371967 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371967view=rev Log: Removed links from contents to removed sections. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/guide.xml Modified:

svn commit: r371968 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk: build.xml project.xml

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 09:59:37 2006 New Revision: 371968 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371968view=rev Log: Decided that it's better to include suffix for release candidates. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 1

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 18:46 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm all for JCL 1.1, but IMO, the above approach should have been discussed before posting these files. it's just a few files posted to my home directory for

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 1

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:14 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 22:07 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:05 +0100, Boris Unckel wrote: snip Second 1.4.2_10 is the actual version, for a new release I would prefer the latest compiler (even if

svn commit: r371976 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 10:39:24 2006 New Revision: 371976 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371976view=rev Log: Removed properties used by the now-removed optional build. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml Modified:

svn commit: r371977 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 10:42:57 2006 New Revision: 371977 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371977view=rev Log: Removed javadoc target. Use maven for documentation including javadocs. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml Modified:

svn commit: r371978 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 10:46:20 2006 New Revision: 371978 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371978view=rev Log: Default target is now 'all' and target 'all' now runs the unit tests. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/build.xml Modified:

Re: [exec] API sketch?

2006-01-24 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Brett Porter wrote: Niklas Gustavsson wrote: /* * StreamHandlers are used for providing input, * retriving the output. Also used for logging. */ StreamHandler getStreamHandler(); void setStreamHandler(StreamHandler streamHandler); My only comments on these is that I don't see the point of

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 1

2006-01-24 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 18:39 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:14 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: Why is it necessary to use two different JVMs? need a 1.4 JVM to compile the java.util stuff but the rest of the code needs to run fine on earlier JVMs. javac

Re: [exec] API sketch?

2006-01-24 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
Brett Porter wrote: Niklas Gustavsson wrote: /* * StreamHandlers are used for providing input, * retriving the output. Also used for logging. */ StreamHandler getStreamHandler(); void setStreamHandler(StreamHandler streamHandler); My only comments on these is that I don't see the point of

Re: [net] JSSE classes in FTPS WAS Re: [net] FTPS submission - legal issues

2006-01-24 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rahul Akolkar writes: No, haven't had to deal with such a situation. But doesn't this mean that the code will only work on a subset of the 1.3 JDKs (Sun)? If so, maybe (3) isn't all that bad? In general, I am biased against introducing dependencies on com.sun

svn commit: r372020 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk: ./ build.properties.sample build.xml

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 13:09:51 2006 New Revision: 372020 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372020view=rev Log: Updated dist method to reflect modern practice. Added optional isolated compilation for releases (requires a pre-1.4 JVM to run the ant tasks and the

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 1

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:35 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 18:39 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:14 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: Why is it necessary to use two different JVMs? need a 1.4 JVM to compile the java.util stuff but the rest of

[logging] commit freeze, please

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
i plan to tag RC2 sometime after 2130GMT today. please do not commit changes after than time until you see the commit record for the tag. cheers - robert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 1

2006-01-24 Thread Dennis Lundberg
robert burrell donkin wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:35 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 18:39 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:14 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: Why is it necessary to use two different JVMs? need a 1.4 JVM to compile the

[net] JSSE classes in FTPS WAS Re: [net] FTPS submission - legal issues

2006-01-24 Thread Jose Juan Montiel
1. Use the javax.net.ssl classes. (Out of the question because of our mandate to support 1.3) 2. Do what Paul and Josejuan did - use the com.sun classes 3. Maybe. use the javax.net.ssl classes but document that if used with JDK 1.4, jsse.jar must be on the classpath. Hi, i'll use the

[lang] EqualsBuilder: Comparison of Collections

2006-01-24 Thread Matthias Pfau
Hi, this is my first post ever to a mailing list so please do not mind to tell me if I do sth. wrong... ;) I just asked myself why the EqualsBuilder does not support the comparison of Collections. Personally, I am very often in the situation that I have to compare Collections. Collections are

svn commit: r372029 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/id/ java/org/apache/commons/id/task/ java/org/apache/commons/id/uuid/ test/org/apache/commons/id/

2006-01-24 Thread joehni
Author: joehni Date: Tue Jan 24 13:51:23 2006 New Revision: 372029 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372029view=rev Log: Dropped IdentifierGeneratorFactory and derived. Dropped IdentifierUtils. Removed:

Re: [logging] please check release candidate 1

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 22:35 +0100, Dennis Lundberg wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:35 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 18:39 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 12:14 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote: Why is it necessary to

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of id/1.0ReleasePlan by JörgSchaible

2006-01-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1%2e0ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Update status.

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Trivial Update of id/1.0Release Plan by JörgSchaible

2006-01-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1%2e0ReleasePlan

Re: [exec] design goals, API sketch, etc.. next step?

2006-01-24 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
jerome lacoste wrote: Niklas, Brett, Trygve all, So here's what I propose to do: - decide which requirements are important. What is the problem we are trying to solve? How do we position us compared to the official's API? etc... Someone using SDK 1.4 or 1.5 should find a compelling reason

svn commit: r372030 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 13:57:44 2006 New Revision: 372030 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372030view=rev Log: Ignore new artifacts directory used by dist target. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/ (props changed) Propchange:

svn commit: r372031 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 13:58:22 2006 New Revision: 372031 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372031view=rev Log: Ignore new artifacts directory used by dist target. (Fix) Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/ (props changed) Propchange:

svn commit: r372032 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_1_0_RC2/

2006-01-24 Thread rdonkin
Author: rdonkin Date: Tue Jan 24 13:59:06 2006 New Revision: 372032 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372032view=rev Log: Tag for the second release candidate for JCL 1.1 Added: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/tags/LOGGING_1_1_0_RC2/ - copied from r372031,

svn commit: r372033 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/id: task/UUIDTask.java uuid/UUID.java uuid/VersionFourGenerator.java uuid/VersionOneGenerator.java

2006-01-24 Thread joehni
Author: joehni Date: Tue Jan 24 14:00:20 2006 New Revision: 372033 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372033view=rev Log: Fix year of copyright. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/id/task/UUIDTask.java

Re: [logging] commit freeze, please

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
done feel free to add documentation enhancements and fixes (dennis? changes.xml?) - robert On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 21:23 +, robert burrell donkin wrote: i plan to tag RC2 sometime after 2130GMT today. please do not commit changes after than time until you see the commit record for the tag.

[logging] please check release candidate 2

2006-01-24 Thread robert burrell donkin
please download and check the 2nd release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/. the binary distributions should have standardised EOLs. installing the latest subversion is giving me a few issues so the source distributions ATM will probably have nix EOLs. please check

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of Logging by BorisUnckel

2006-01-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by BorisUnckel: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging --

Re: [lang] EqualsBuilder: Comparison of Collections

2006-01-24 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Matthias Pfau wrote: this is my first post ever to a mailing list Welcome I just asked myself why the EqualsBuilder does not support the comparison of Collections. Personally, I am very often in the situation that I have to compare Collections. Collections are widely used and there might be

Re: [id] Review before 1.0 (Summary)

2006-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael, Michael Heuer wrote on Friday, January 20, 2006 7:40 PM: On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Phil Steitz wrote: I have started working on this. What I had in mind was just a simple facility for creating composite identifiers created by

Re: doap maven project descriptor [was Re: svn commit: r371566]

2006-01-24 Thread Martin van den Bemt
On general @ jakarta Henri mentioned that the BCEL version was generated from the project.xml. I assume he did that with these doap files. I hope that Henri didn't mean generated by hand from the project.xml. It should be pretty easy to whip a plugin for maven 1 and 2. Mvgr, Martin Niall

Re: doap maven project descriptor [was Re: svn commit: r371566]

2006-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/24/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On general @ jakarta Henri mentioned that the BCEL version was generated from the project.xml. I assume he did that with these doap files. I hope that Henri didn't mean generated by hand from the project.xml. It should be pretty easy

Re: [net] JSSE classes in FTPS WAS Re: [net] FTPS submission - legal issues

2006-01-24 Thread Steve Cohen
Jose Juan Montiel wrote: 1. Use the javax.net.ssl classes. (Out of the question because of our mandate to support 1.3) 2. Do what Paul and Josejuan did - use the com.sun classes 3. Maybe. use the javax.net.ssl classes but document that if used with JDK 1.4, jsse.jar must be on the

svn commit: r372063 - /jakarta/commons/trunks-sandbox/pom.xml

2006-01-24 Thread brett
Author: brett Date: Tue Jan 24 16:43:43 2006 New Revision: 372063 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372063view=rev Log: note the correct build requirements Modified: jakarta/commons/trunks-sandbox/pom.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/trunks-sandbox/pom.xml URL:

Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi folks, which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of a component? Building for commons-id, I just get: == % === xdoc:jelly-transform: [echo] Generating /home/joehni/src/Jakarta/sandbox/id/target/docs/javadoc.html from

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Martin Cooper
On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of a component? This file has the list of plugins and their versions:

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of a component? Building for commons-id, I just get: == % === xdoc:jelly-transform: [echo] Generating

svn commit: r372076 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/project.xml

2006-01-24 Thread joehni
Author: joehni Date: Tue Jan 24 17:44:46 2006 New Revision: 372076 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=372076view=rev Log: Use up-to-date xdoc-plugin. Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/project.xml URL:

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Jörg Schaible
Thanks Martin and Rahul, [snip] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/pluginUpdate.txt This has become a popular question, need to put it on the wiki as well. Maybe after dinner ... I've added it to the project.xml of c-id, so it is available the next

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi folks, which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of a component? Building for commons-id, I just get: == % === xdoc:jelly-transform: [echo] Generating /home/joehni/src/Jakarta/sandbox/id/target/docs/javadoc.html from

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of JakartaCommonsEtiquette by RahulAkolkar

2006-01-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette The comment on the change is: s/Federation/Foundation/

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of JakartaCommonsEtiquette by RahulAkolkar

2006-01-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette The comment on the change is: Unclear why this is on the

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of UsingSVN by RahulAkolkar

2006-01-24 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/UsingSVN The comment on the change is: Adding link removed from etiquette page since

[wiki] Proposed changes

2006-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
I'm proposing to move some content around on the Commons wiki. Motivating factors are: * Discourage amorphous growth on one or two pages * Distribute content over already existing pages (some of which are mostly abandoned) * Reduce the number of orphaned pages, aim for better wiki navigation

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:42 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of a component? Building for commons-id, I just get: == % === xdoc:jelly-transform:

Re: Which Maven / xdoc-plugin version to build component site?

2006-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/24/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:42 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ xdoc-plugin is 1.8 snap/ Try 1.9.2. Some folks have begun adding a specific version dependency to the POM (marked site

Encryption - Common HTTP client

2006-01-24 Thread PARVEEN GARG \(GR/EIL\)
Hello all, I have a question regarding encryption and export control. Does Apache, Commons HTTPclient include any SW encryption that restricts export (i.e. special ECCN code)? Best Regards, Parveen Garg