On 4/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons
Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months
ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support.
--
On 4/11/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons
Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months
ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support.
On 4/10/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons
Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months
The descriptions of the components on the index page seemed quite
wordy and noisy to me when I was trying to create a one page summary,
so I edited out the redundant text and chopped it down a bit. Here's
the modified index page:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons.html
Any interest?
Hen
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39269.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At work I compile FileUpload against the Servlet 2.4 spec. This means
a patch so that the mock classes in the unit test will successfully
extend the 2.4 super classes.
Any interest in this being applied to fileupload?
Hen
-
To
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 00:30 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
The descriptions of the components on the index page seemed quite
wordy and noisy to me when I was trying to create a one page summary,
so I edited out the redundant text and chopped it down a bit. Here's
the modified index page:
Hello,
I am trying to port Tomcat 5.5 to HP OS. I would like to know if
there are any Test Suites available to validate the port for Tomcat 5.5.
Thanks Regards,
Sridhar Kumar .T
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM:
[snip]
id: Generate globally unique identifiers
Drop the globally here. It is dependent on the generator what globally
means.
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:32 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM:
[snip]
id: Generate globally unique identifiers
Drop the globally here. It is dependent on the generator what globally
means.
Yes, but Generate unique identifiers doesn't
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:40 AM:
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:32 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM:
[snip]
id: Generate globally unique identifiers
Drop the globally here. It is dependent on the generator what
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
Hello:
What are the plans for the breakout of HttpClient into HTTP components?
Every time I look for the code, I realize that there are no
nightly-builds. The wiki [1] does not point to any code but I recall
finding a site describing examples and SVN pointers, but I am not sure
how I got there
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39271.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:41 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello:
What are the plans for the breakout of HttpClient into HTTP components?
Every time I look for the code, I realize that there are no
nightly-builds. The wiki [1] does not point to any code but I recall
finding a site describing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39271.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39272.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am using Commons Digester to parse one XML file to a Java Object and
the code is not populating my Java Bean. The XML Files are
Rules.xml :
?xml version=1.0?
digester-rules
pattern value=messages/message
object-create-rule
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39260.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4/11/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:40 AM:
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:32 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM:
[snip]
id: Generate globally unique identifiers
Drop the
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons
Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months
ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support.
--
[X] +1 Move [scxml] to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20523.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20523.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin Cooper wrote:
Well, they've already got Commons IO, since FileUpload depends on that, and
that has FileNameUtils.getName() to get just the file name, so do we really
need to add another method in FileUpload that just wraps that call?
String filename =
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 23:08 +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Oh, this is a tough one...
- library-ness - if this were a library that assisted with state
handling, with an optional ability to read from the scxml format, then
that might fit better with a commons library style component
an
Hi all,
(I looked at various FAQ's and some previous mailing list answers to
I want to contribute and I hope I do it right ;)
I'm a fan of collections and use it all over the place, but have a two
of functions I'd like to propose. I use these functions in some
operations of Collections of Maps
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20523.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 4/11/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
Well, they've already got Commons IO, since FileUpload depends on that,
and
that has FileNameUtils.getName() to get just the file name, so do we
really
need to add another method in FileUpload that just wraps
On 4/11/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At work I compile FileUpload against the Servlet 2.4 spec. This means
a patch so that the mock classes in the unit test will successfully
extend the 2.4 super classes.
Any interest in this being applied to fileupload?
Can you say more
49 matches
Mail list logo