Re: [VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-04-11 Thread Henri Yandell
On 4/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support. --

Re: [VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-04-11 Thread Dion Gillard
On 4/11/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support.

Re: [VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-04-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 4/10/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/11/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months

[site] shorter descriptions on index

2006-04-11 Thread Henri Yandell
The descriptions of the components on the index page seemed quite wordy and noisy to me when I was trying to create a one page summary, so I edited out the redundant text and chopped it down a bit. Here's the modified index page: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons.html Any interest? Hen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39269] New: - TelnetClientTest has a failure on OS X 10.4

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39269. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[fileupload] Compile against Servlet 2.4 spec?

2006-04-11 Thread Henri Yandell
At work I compile FileUpload against the Servlet 2.4 spec. This means a patch so that the mock classes in the unit test will successfully extend the 2.4 super classes. Any interest in this being applied to fileupload? Hen - To

Re: [site] shorter descriptions on index

2006-04-11 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 00:30 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: The descriptions of the components on the index page seemed quite wordy and noisy to me when I was trying to create a one page summary, so I edited out the redundant text and chopped it down a bit. Here's the modified index page:

Any Test Suites to Validate Tomcat 5.5 Port?

2006-04-11 Thread T, Sridhar Kumar (STSD)
Hello, I am trying to port Tomcat 5.5 to HP OS. I would like to know if there are any Test Suites available to validate the port for Tomcat 5.5. Thanks Regards, Sridhar Kumar .T - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: [site] shorter descriptions on index

2006-04-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM: [snip] id: Generate globally unique identifiers Drop the globally here. It is dependent on the generator what globally means. - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

RE: [site] shorter descriptions on index

2006-04-11 Thread Simon Kitching
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:32 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM: [snip] id: Generate globally unique identifiers Drop the globally here. It is dependent on the generator what globally means. Yes, but Generate unique identifiers doesn't

RE: [site] shorter descriptions on index

2006-04-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:40 AM: On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:32 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM: [snip] id: Generate globally unique identifiers Drop the globally here. It is dependent on the generator what

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-chain (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-04-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-chain (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-04-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-04-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community

[httpclient] HTTP components

2006-04-11 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello: What are the plans for the breakout of HttpClient into HTTP components? Every time I look for the code, I realize that there are no nightly-builds. The wiki [1] does not point to any code but I recall finding a site describing examples and SVN pointers, but I am not sure how I got there

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39182] - [configuration] Preserve file structure (line comments) when re-saving properties file

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39271] New: - [beanutils] MethodUtils.getAccessibleMethod does not work for enums

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39271. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [httpclient] HTTP components

2006-04-11 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:41 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: Hello: What are the plans for the breakout of HttpClient into HTTP components? Every time I look for the code, I realize that there are no nightly-builds. The wiki [1] does not point to any code but I recall finding a site describing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39271] - [beanutils] MethodUtils.getAccessibleMethod does not work for enums

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39271. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39272] New: - FileUtils needs a toString that takes a filename and returns its contents as a string

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39272. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39260] - [validator] Not Validating Emails with 4-character Domain Qualifier

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39260. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39182] - [configuration] Preserve file structure (line comments) when re-saving properties file

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39182] - [configuration] Preserve file structure (line comments) when re-saving properties file

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

help for Commenos Digester

2006-04-11 Thread Qaiser Mehmood
Hi, I am using Commons Digester to parse one XML file to a Java Object and the code is not populating my Java Bean. The XML Files are Rules.xml : ?xml version=1.0? digester-rules pattern value=messages/message object-create-rule

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39260] - [validator] Not Validating Emails with 4-character Domain Qualifier

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39260. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39260] - [validator] Not Validating Emails with 4-character Domain Qualifier

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39260. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [site] shorter descriptions on index

2006-04-11 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/11/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:40 AM: On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 11:32 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Simon Kitching wrote on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:22 AM: [snip] id: Generate globally unique identifiers Drop the

Re: [VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-04-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Rahul Akolkar wrote: I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support. -- [X] +1 Move [scxml] to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39276] New: - [fileupload] add support for Servlet 2.3 filters

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39276] - [fileupload] add support for Servlet 2.3 filters

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39276] - [fileupload] add support for Servlet 2.3 filters

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39276] - [fileupload] add support for Servlet 2.3 filters

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39276] - [fileupload] add support for Servlet 2.3 filters

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39276] - [fileupload] add support for Servlet 2.3 filters

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39276. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20523] - [fileupload] Model FileUpload model to mimic javax.servlet.Request

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20523. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20523] - [fileupload] Model FileUpload model to mimic javax.servlet.Request

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20523. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [fileupload] FileItem.getName() IE prefix

2006-04-11 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Martin Cooper wrote: Well, they've already got Commons IO, since FileUpload depends on that, and that has FileNameUtils.getName() to get just the file name, so do we really need to add another method in FileUpload that just wraps that call? String filename =

Re: [VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-04-11 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 23:08 +0100, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Oh, this is a tough one... - library-ness - if this were a library that assisted with state handling, with an optional ability to read from the scxml format, then that might fit better with a commons library style component an

[collections] proposed new features - MapIndexing, MapPartitioning

2006-04-11 Thread Paul Feuer
Hi all, (I looked at various FAQ's and some previous mailing list answers to I want to contribute and I hope I do it right ;) I'm a fan of collections and use it all over the place, but have a two of functions I'd like to propose. I use these functions in some operations of Collections of Maps

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20523] - [fileupload] Model FileUpload model to mimic javax.servlet.Request

2006-04-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20523. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [fileupload] FileItem.getName() IE prefix

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/11/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: Well, they've already got Commons IO, since FileUpload depends on that, and that has FileNameUtils.getName() to get just the file name, so do we really need to add another method in FileUpload that just wraps

Re: [fileupload] Compile against Servlet 2.4 spec?

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On 4/11/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At work I compile FileUpload against the Servlet 2.4 spec. This means a patch so that the mock classes in the unit test will successfully extend the 2.4 super classes. Any interest in this being applied to fileupload? Can you say more