On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:05 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
is there anyway to get the maven folks to take a look at the project.xml
before it's released rather than afterwards?
You might trying pinging Carlos Sanchez - hes
Author: psteitz
Date: Sun Nov 26 08:56:35 2006
New Revision: 479381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479381
Log:
Reverted to hand-crafted ant build, which is needed for JDK 1.3.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/build.properties.sample
Modified:
On 11/26/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:05 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
is there anyway to get the maven folks to take a look at the project.xml
before it's released rather than
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:10 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 11/26/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:05 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 11/25/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
is there anyway to get the maven folks to
Author: psteitz
Date: Sun Nov 26 10:27:49 2006
New Revision: 479394
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479394
Log:
Fixed ant xml parser config.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/build.properties.sample
jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/build.xml
Modified:
On 11/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/25/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting ready to roll 1.2.2...
Couple of comments (thought I'd get them in early):
Thanks!
1) What version of the JDK is DBCP compatible with? If, for example,
it is JDK 1.3 would
Author: psteitz
Date: Sun Nov 26 10:46:23 2006
New Revision: 479401
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479401
Log:
Changed to better property names.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/build.properties.sample
jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/build.xml
Modified:
On 11/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
webserver; since this can't/shouldn't be done until the
http://vmbuild.apache.org/~commons/nightly/nightly_reports/ now
contains a deploy of the site for a component. ie:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/~commons/nightly/nightly_reports/commons-beanutils/site/
Only for the m1 components currently.
Hen
Author: psteitz
Date: Sun Nov 26 10:26:06 2006
New Revision: 479392
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479392
Log:
Set JDK targets.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/project.properties
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Author: rahul
Date: Sun Nov 26 11:32:47 2006
New Revision: 479411
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479411
Log:
Advertised dependencies are not the same as 1.7 (though any previous set will
still work). Thanks to Niall Pembertion niall DOT pemberton AT gmail DOT com.
Modified:
On 11/26/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
webserver; since this can't/shouldn't be done until the
On 11/26/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
snip/
- The release notes say the dependencies haven't changed - but the
On 11/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
You might trying pinging Carlos Sanchez - hes given feedback on
improving the project.xml to help m2 in the past.
I asked Wendy Smoak (who knows way more about maven/m2 than me) to
look at these scopes and she thinks they look good.
JVM detection should use run-time check
---
Key: DAEMON-89
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-89
Project: Commons Daemon
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
I'd like to see it made clear in the release notes that digester 1.8 will work
fine with the same dependencies as 1.7, ie that people can upgrade digester.jar
without updating anything else. Of course we can *recommend* more modern libs,
but knowing a simple upgrade works is very important.
On 11/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see it made clear in the release notes that digester 1.8 will
work fine with the same dependencies as 1.7, ie that people can upgrade
digester.jar without updating anything else. Of course we can *recommend*
more modern libs,
Author: niallp
Date: Sun Nov 26 17:23:27 2006
New Revision: 479485
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479485
Log:
Add older version details to DOAP file and Changes Report
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/validator/trunk/doap_validator.rdf
Author: jochen
Date: Sun Nov 26 17:25:52 2006
New Revision: 479487
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479487
Log:
Enabling zip files for the binary distribution.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/assembly/bin.xml
Modified:
Author: niallp
Date: Sun Nov 26 17:49:19 2006
New Revision: 479494
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=479494
Log:
Add a note about putting release details in the DOAP file
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/release.xml
Modified:
Hi, Niall,
On 11/26/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have preferred the release be cut using maven1 rather than m2.
The maven1 build is tried and tested and the gripes of those of us
that checked out previous releases have been fixed in the maven1
build. I guess that
On 11/27/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Niall,
On 11/26/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have preferred the release be cut using maven1 rather than m2.
The maven1 build is tried and tested and the gripes of those of us
that checked out previous releases
On 11/26/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Niall,
On 11/26/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have preferred the release be cut using maven1 rather than m2.
The maven1 build is tried and tested and the gripes of those of us
that checked out previous
On 11/26/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/26/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
On 11/27/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course it is. These changes are incompatible in that some people's code
will no longer compile against the new version.
In this particular case, the situation is like this: If people are
actually depending on the presence of this code,
25 matches
Mail list logo