Re: third patch for digester -> selfConfiguring objects :-) minimal change following Rob Donkin's and Craig's advice

ct: Re: third patch for digester -> selfConfiguring objects :-) minimal change following Rob Donkin's and Craig's advice > > On Tuesday, December 18, 2001, at 10:43 PM, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > Hey! > > hi mika > > > This one is rather minimalistic, but gives a

third patch for digester -> selfConfiguring objects :-) minimal change following Rob Donkin's and Craig's advice

Hey! This one is rather minimalistic, but gives all to me that I need. Some documentation is in the class javadoc of the SelfConfigureObject Interface. Mika commons.diff Description: Binary data SelfConfigureObject.java Description: Binary data -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Second patch, somewhat easier, replacing the first one....

easier, replacing the first one > > On Tuesday, December 18, 2001, at 03:37 AM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > >> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:09:48 +0100 > >> From: Mika Goeckel <

Re: Second patch, somewhat easier, replacing the first one....

PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:01 PM Subject: Re: Second patch, somewhat easier, replacing the first one > > On Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 11:41 PM, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > Rob, > > > > is that what you thought of? I got rid of the second

Second patch, somewhat easier, replacing the first one....

Rob, is that what you thought of? I got rid of the second interface by changing 'Rule'. Seems more straightforward. About other matching methods: Yes, I think other methods of matching (XPath i.e.) could come, but as long as the interface is backwards compatible, selfconfiguring objects will con

Re: selfconfiguring objects patch for digester

ber 13, 2001 9:37 PM Subject: Re: selfconfiguring objects patch for digester > On Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 06:23 PM, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > take your time. > > > > The reason for me to change the basic rules is, that it is transparen

Re: selfconfiguring objects patch for digester

lly change the rules, debugging these rulesets could become nearly impossible. - robert On Thursday, December 13, 2001, at 03:51 PM, Mika Goeckel wrote: > Hi, > > please find attached my changes to Digester, ObjectCreateRule and > ObjectCreationFactory + two new interfaces (source in t

selfconfiguring objects patch for digester

Hi,   please find attached my changes to Digester, ObjectCreateRule and ObjectCreationFactory + two new interfaces (source in the jar). I think my docu is not that good -- English is not my mother tongue.   Some example is in the documentation of SelfConfigureObject.   Looking forward to you

Re: Self configuring Objects or is it possible to change the rule set during the parse phase?

guring Objects or is it possible to change the rule set during the parse phase? > > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:25:22 +0100 > > From: Mika Goeckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List

Re: Self configuring Objects or is it possible to change the rule set during the parse phase?

Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:13 AM Subject: Re: Self configuring Objects or is it possible to change the rule set during the parse phase? > > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:35:58 +0100 > > From: Mika Goeckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Self configuring Objects or is it possible to change the rule set during the parse phase?

Hi! Is it possible to add rules to the ruleset of a digester after the parse has been started? The reason for that is, that it would enable us to put the knowledge about child objects within something like a configure() method of a just created object. For example if someone creates a complic