On Jun 29, 2004, at 4:21 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
This vote is to approve the public release of commons codec 1.3-RC1.
[X] +1 Go ahead and release 1.3-RC1
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Don't release 1.3-RC1, because...
-
On Dec 20, 2003, at 2:47 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
To go to A-C means to have no supporting community other than codec
developers.
Will you ask for your own mailing list?
I would not.
or be on the same list as Serf?
Or be here on the same list as jxpath, digester, io, etc? I do not see
the
I think that a lot of this can be taken care of in the join, should J-C
join A-C in its entirety, since there will be a large group joining a
smaller one.
On Dec 20, 2003, at 5:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The big difference is that, if J-C joins A-C, we don't necessarily
maintain our current
On Dec 19, 2003, at 6:56 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Codec, a small - probably the smallest - piece of code in
Jakarta-land. Is well suited for inclusion in Apache Commons. I
propose that Codec be used as a guinea pig of sorts to test the waters
of Apache Commons. It is not language specific,
---
---
Vote: Elect Simon Kitching As Jakarta Commons Committer
[X] +1 Yes let him commit!
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I am against this (please include a reason).
---
I could see how it could be useful. If you are willing to commit and
support it, and the code is backwards-compatible (should be), then I am
+1. Go for it.
Scott
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 08:13 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to add a feature to the digester, allowing property
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED
/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16440
So, I'll make a proposal and hope for lazy consensus:
Let's replace Base64 in codec with the current HttpClient version.
I believe that was actually Scott Sanders (sanders), not Sander Striker (striker) :)
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED
is long overdue.
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do it.
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not have the bandwidth
to do the RM, or to fix the methodUtils caching thing. Anyone who wants to should go
for the release.
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why couldn't this just be in the next version of lang?
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a directory for sub-sub projects. I did these lest the
/dist/jakarta/commons directory be overrun with too many entries.
Thanks,
Scott Sanders
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
there is nothing left to take away. - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 01:27:01PM -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
Vote +1 to the vote for that and it could be ;)
..
sorry. hard to resist :)
+1 for functors in lang. I think this is part of the 'missing link' that got left out
+of java.lang.
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
wanted to vote for Al Gore but couldn't find him on this ballot
-1: I have a good reason to hold up the release.
(Oh yah, +1 from me.)
+1
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
by writing my own rule that waited until end().
I would mark this as WONTFIX.
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/30 09:46:29
Modified:docs commons.html digester.html
xdocsdigester.xml
Log:
added resources section for digester with link to onjava article
Revision ChangesPath
1.58 +0 -18 jakarta-commons/docs/commons.html
Index
ballot
+1 [x] Yes, move commons-launcher to Commons Proper
-1 [ ] No, because:
/ballot
In addition, it is proposed that a first 0.9 beta release of
commons-launcher be made available.
ballot
+1 [X] Yes.
-0 [ ] No, because:
/ballot
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED
sanders 2002/10/24 16:03:32
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:03:44
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz/src - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:04:01
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz/src/conf - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:04:01
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz/src/java - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:04:21
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz/src/java/org - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:04:27
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz/src/java/org/apache - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:04:34
jakarta-commons-sandbox/clazz/src/java/org/apache/commons - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
sanders 2002/10/24 16:05:34
Added: clazzPROPOSAL.html RELEASE-NOTES.txt STATUS.html
build.properties.sample build.xml
clazz/src/conf MANIFEST.MF
clazz/src/java/org/apache/commons/clazz MethodUtils.java
Log:
Bootstrap
for you.
Let's start it now. BeanUtils just released 1.5, and robert was talking about
bringing over MethodUtils.
Let's just fire it up :)
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:39:31PM +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
good work scott :)
Thanks robert, shall we start clazz now?
Scott
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
in stone, feel free to change it all. Just wanted to get something
started that wasn't reorg email :)
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:commons-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
+1.
Vote to promote the FileUpload component from Commons
Sandbox to Commons
Proper:
[ ] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[ ] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why:
- 8
I am +1 on this Costin, could you just patch the charter and then we
vote on it? I would prefer to change the wording to use anything
besides PMC though. IMO.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Costin Manolache [mailto:cmanolache;yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:45 PM
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:22:30PM +0100, John Keyes wrote:
[ ] +1 I am in favor of this action and will help
[X] +0 I am in favor of this action but cannot help
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of this action
[ ] -1 I am opposed to this action and here is why:
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED
sanders 2002/10/23 21:40:42
Modified:beanutils RELEASE-NOTES.txt build.xml
Log:
1.5 release
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +26 -6 jakarta-commons/beanutils/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES.txt
sanders 2002/10/23 21:42:28
Modified:beanutils STATUS.html
Log:
1.5 release
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/beanutils/STATUS.html
Index: STATUS.html
===
RCS file: /home/cvs
sanders 2002/10/23 21:44:07
Modified:beanutils project.xml
Log:
1.5 release
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +7 -1 jakarta-commons/beanutils/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs
sanders 2002/10/23 22:02:56
Modified:beanutils build.xml project.xml
Log:
rev the version
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/beanutils/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file
sanders 2002/10/23 22:09:17
Modified:docs beanutils.html components.html
xdocsbeanutils.xml components.xml
Log:
update the website to reflect the release
Revision ChangesPath
1.55 +6 -5 jakarta-commons/docs/beanutils.html
Index
Big +1. Until the members to committers ratio can improve,
the only
way
to pick up the slack is for EVERYONE to be watching out for
this type of
thing.
+1
i think that we in the commons needs to take the supervision of the
sandbox more seriously. since it's part of our
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Michael A. Smith wrote:
[snip]
I don't think this should stop us from improving oversight in
license
compliance issues in jakarta-commons and jakarta-commons-sandbox.
Big +1. Until the members to committers ratio can improve,
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there another one?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:mas;apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [apache-commons] Apache Commons info?
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Henri Yandell
This is an area that I've often wondered about -- how do most
people deal with writing unit tests for this sort of stuff?
In this situation, I suppose you could do some classloader tricks to
reload the same class with a different method signature, which would
make the call fail the second
I would say patch 12728 and release.
The sealed attribute might be nice though :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:rob;AlmostHuman.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [beanutils] ready for 1.5
Can you explain the property 0 thing a little more? I don't understand why Digester
cannot handle it.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:07 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Jakarta Commons
Property 0 says that parsing of appender tags are driven by
logger tags. For example, the following config script does nothing.
OK, I think I understand now.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
!DOCTYPE log4j:configuration SYSTEM log4j.dtd
log4j:configuration
Ceki,
Karma is all you need. Go for it.
-Original Message-
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:41 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [joran] a new project in the sandbox
Could I please have karma?
That would be great. Just follow the directions on the website.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Sean C. Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:20 PM
To: jakarta commons developers List
Subject: [logging] unit tests
I was browsing the source
You are volunteering to be the Release Manager? If so, I am +1, and
willing the help with publishing if you don't have access.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE]
Somebody want to patch the release HOWTO to reflect the need to update
this type of thing?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging
Richard has volunteered, with the exception of daedalus issues, which I
volunteered to help him with.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:05 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re:
sanders 2002/09/26 09:08:39
Modified:docs commons.html components.html discovery.html
xdocscomponents.xml discovery.xml
Log:
update discovery URLs
Revision ChangesPath
1.52 +21 -0 jakarta-commons/docs/commons.html
Index: commons.html
Try it again :)
-Original Message-
From: Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [discovery]
I went to find out more information about the discovery
package, and the two links, best practices and the
On a related note, how do you update a 'mavenized' site such as
discovery? It looks like James Strachan built the last one for
discovery, how do I go about updating it, or can someone else please
update it?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders
Sent: Thursday, September 26
Steven, are you willing to either patch it to how you think it should
work, or wait until a 1.1 release. The purpose of this release is to
get another Apache product off of a nightly build before they ship.
Are you still -1?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell
volunteer to be the release manager.
This is also my explicit vote for cutting 1.0.2: +1
By my count, current binding votes are at:
+12 (scott sanders, richard sitze)
+00
-10
***
Richard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
On a related note, how do you update a 'mavenized' site such as
discovery? It looks like James Strachan built the last one for
discovery, how do I go about updating it, or can someone
else please
update it?
maven has a fancy goal that generates the site and updates
cvs. of
sanders 2002/09/26 20:33:45
Modified:xdocscomponents.xml
Log:
caught Richard's typo :)
Revision ChangesPath
1.52 +1 -1 jakarta-commons/xdocs/components.xml
Index: components.xml
The only problem with that is that if the ant build does it, and the
build is run on Windows, the tar files are not correct from a
permissions viewpoint. Just my experience with tar files of late.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
+1. I can double team on the RM stuff when you need help with daedalus.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [logging] VOTE for cutting release 1.0.2
There were some
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] ready for a release
Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Should we add JDK1.2 to the dependencies
In earlier discussions on this topic, I thought the conclusion was
that [lang] would grab the MethodUtils class out of beanutils, and
create a corresponding ConstructorUtils class for
dynamically invoking
constructors. At some appropriate time, [beanutils] could
deprecate
its
The only problem with that is that if the ant build does
it, and the
build is run on Windows, the tar files are not correct from a
permissions viewpoint. Just my experience with tar files of late.
I build software on Windows only under the most dire of
circumstances. ;)
Point
Or, since no one has disagreed with you, you could consider that lazy
consensus and commit a patch for it :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re:
Although jsp:setProperty was one of the inspirations that
led to the creation of BeanUtils.populate(), I chose not to
slavishly copy the JSP semantics -- in particular the very
very wierd handling of zero-length Strings. I found it much
more useful in typical form fill-in scenarios to
Taras,
These are all excellent ideas. Would it be possible for you to submit a
patch for one/all of these? You're input is very much welcomed and we
would like to invite you to participate even more.
Thanks,
Scott Sanders
-Original Message-
From: Taras Tielkes [mailto:[EMAIL
+1.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 8:08 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Commons Lang release 1.0
I'm proposing a vote for a 1.0 release of Commons Lang to be made.
The difference
The most relevant is:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases.html
-Original Message-
From: John Keyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM
To: commons-dev
Subject: Preparing a Release
Hi all,
I think the time is nearly prime for a CLI
at the commons index as well as the
jakarta index ;)
I've just done a brief scource of that document and I notice
that all references are to use ant. Should there be a
separate page for maven based releases?
-John K
On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 21:43 Etc/GMT, Scott Sanders wrote
[question]
I'm considering the authors to be Colebourne and Downey. So I
need some nods from Daniel and Caswell. Also Ola Berg and
Scott Sanders if they've been focusing on them at all.
I have taken a look, and I like what I see. Let's go with this.
[question]
Is there anything
[question]
Is there anything not in commons proper which people believe
is highly important to get in there before a 1.0 release??
The most important thing that is missing for the 1.0 release is the 1.0
release. :)
Scott
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+1. The developer community issue is a concern, but as with BCEL,
Lucene, PoolMan, the community as a whole is quite large, and not just
developers make the community.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:48
This is very true.
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Would there be a good reason for it, other than because we can?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Tal Lev-Ami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:13 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List (E-mail)
Subject: [Digester] XML Pull
Anybody tried to adapt the
Use the BeanPropertySetterRule.
Digester.addBeanPropertySetter(script), or something similar.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: emmanuel.boudrant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:19 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Digester can retrieve CDDATA ?
Well, you _should_ start as protective as possible, and then open up
from there.
Sounds like you have a need for it to be public. I have no objections.
Robert? Craig?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:39 PM
To:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [commons committer vote II]
costin nominated me a few days back, but not under a 'vote' subject line
- so I'm hoping that the lack of
+1.
-Original Message-
From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:19 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [ committer vote ] - for an extra committer...
Already a committer on the Struts project, wodering if the committers of
the commons would
I want to do a 1.0.1 ASAP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: commons-logging fixes
Hi,
I commited 2 small fixes - to report the right method/class
if
Yes, this is the place. Ask away.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HttpClient development
is this the appropriate forum to ask questions about
HttpClient development? is
opposed to this release, and here is why:
-- Cut Here --
--
Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+0. Sorry I can't help with it.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Dmitri Plotnikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] JXPath 1.0 Release Plan
I am calling for a vote on the JXPath 1.0 Beta Release
Plan
It is currently allowed in the sandbox only.
-Original Message-
From: otisg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: commit karma for Jakarta commiters?
Hello,
Did I just dream about this, or was there a long thread
Hi all,
I am working on vindico, a replacement for Alexandria over in the
Alexandria CVS, and I am using commons-digester, which in turn uses
commons-logging.
When running Vindico as an Ant task, it starts running and then says
that it cannot find the LogFactoryImpl class.
I have traced this
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
The problem that I have is the LogFactoryImpl class is in the same
class loader as LogFactory, so I am suggesting a change to
LogFactory,
such that the default
Gier is correct. In the end jjar gets jars. Maven is an entire build
methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in a larger
context.
Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work.
Scott (Waiting for those jjar commits ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr.
Repository?
On 4/16/02 5:32 PM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gier is correct. In the end jjar gets jars. Maven is an
entire build
methodology. JJAR is a tool, with no meaning unless used in
a larger
context.
Maven could be a consumer of JJAR's work.
Scott (Waiting
Developers List
Subject: Re: [JJAR] Status? Jar Repository?
On 4/16/02 5:45 PM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the second time I have done that. I must formally apologize
now.
Sorry G-E-I-R :)
The apology wasn't necessary, of course. At all.
I just have been waiting
That is just beautiful!
Perhaps we should think about moving all of Commons/Jakarta to this look
and feel.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Latka site update
In
I think we should just vote for it and get it released.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [pool] release - what needs to be done?
Turbine has dropped usage of its own
Anyone hae any blockers that would stop the release of BeanUtils 1.3 or
Digester 1.2?
Digester has the XML rules stuff that I would like to get released, and
both have had some good bugfixes.
Opiniions, suggestions?
Scott Sanders
I am still +1 on adding the interface.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:26 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [logging] Need interface... VOTE
-1
I see too much confusion for any
Godd work everyone. Kudos.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; General Jakarta
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Jakarta Commons Collections 2.0 Released
Could we replace daemon with this if this is the case. Daemon is
slightly more descriptive than wrapper IMHO.
+1 either way.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:39 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
I am also +1, but thinking the names are fine for the reasons stated by
Geir.
It is just a marker interface, but if it was in commons-logging then
Velocity/Struts/whatever wouldn't have to recreate it just to use it.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Didn't get the attachment.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: PROPOSAL: new 'wrapper' commons component
Hi,
I would like to propose a new common
Below is a diff of the proposed change to charter.xml. Basically says
any Apache committer is allowed to work in the sandbox, instead of any
Jakarta committer. The intention of this is that other Apache
subprojects (xml), also have some useful java code.
Here is my +1.
Scott Sanders
Index
I personally believe the artificial barrier is just that, artificial.
IMHO, an Apache committer is an Apache committer, and I think we should
modify the charter.
Shall I propose the vote on another thread?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
.
Scott Sanders
-Original Message-
From: Greg McCreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:05 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Digester/BuanUtils Error trapping ...
Hi All,
This is my first posting here. I'm looking at using the
Digester class
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
