Re: [All] License change

2004-03-01 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Mar 1, 2004, at 7:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/02/2004 10:35:29 PM: As you know, the board of directors of the ASF has approved a new license, v2.0, and has mandated that the entire ASF codebase be moved to it. Specifically, they require

Re: NOTICE.txt's in jars Was: [All] License change

2004-02-29 Thread dion
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/02/2004 03:21:44 AM: Doing resources resource Add: targetPathMETA-INF/targetPath includes includeNOTICE.txt/include /includes /resource /resources in the build kind of works. You get a

Re: NOTICE.txt's in jars Was: [All] License change

2004-02-29 Thread Henri Yandell
Thanks. Seems to work well. Hen On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/02/2004 03:21:44 AM: Doing resources resource Add: targetPathMETA-INF/targetPath includes includeNOTICE.txt/include

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do we need to think about modifying the documentation build scripts and source (and so on) so that they are licensed under AL2? See the very last point in http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html The license is supposed to

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-28 Thread robert burrell donkin
i think that i remember something about adding licenses to every artifact that they can be attached to. do we need to think about modifying the documentation build scripts and source (and so on) so that they are licensed under AL2? - robert On 27 Feb 2004, at 11:35, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
In projects I have done by hand, I have added the licence to properties, xml and html files too. This wasn't done in Hen's big sandbox change, but I'm less worried by that. We should do it for commons proper. Stephen - Original Message - From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] i

[All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
As you know, the board of directors of the ASF has approved a new license, v2.0, and has mandated that the entire ASF codebase be moved to it. Specifically, they require that any code released after March 1, 2004 be placed under this new license. However, given that snapshots of commons

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Henri Yandell
Will start doing so tonight. I estimate more than 5 minutes :) relicence new licence.txt new notice.txt include notice in jar build each component cvs ci Hen On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: As you know, the board of directors of the ASF has approved a new license, v2.0, and

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread matthew.hawthorne
Henri Yandell wrote: Will start doing so tonight. I estimate more than 5 minutes :) relicence new licence.txt new notice.txt include notice in jar build each component cvs ci Can someone post the script used to change the licenses in source files? I think Stephen posted it originally. Better

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
It is in committers module in relicense directory Emmanuel - Original Message - From: matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [All] License change Henri Yandell wrote: Will start

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Henri Yandell
I tell if something has been ASF2.0-ised based on whether the LICENSE.txt in the top directory is 2.0 or 1.1. So a simple grep should be able to tell. As Stephen's pointed out, I've neglected to put NOTICE.txt's in place and they need to go into the jars [maven resource I presume]. Hen On Fri,

RE: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, I tell if something has been ASF2.0-ised based on whether the LICENSE.txt in the top directory is 2.0 or 1.1. I've been using the same method ;) The committers/relicense/src/java/org/apache/commiters/ReplaceLicense class is great, works without a hitch. I'm done converting the tomcat

RE: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Henri Yandell
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, I tell if something has been ASF2.0-ised based on whether the LICENSE.txt in the top directory is 2.0 or 1.1. I've been using the same method ;) The committers/relicense/src/java/org/apache/commiters/ReplaceLicense class is great,

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that it does have one feature, which I've been fixing manually rather than at source. 1999,2002 seems to become: 1999,2002-2004. I've been manually changing it to 1999-2004, which I presume is okay. From what I know,

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Henri Yandell
My screwup then. Hopefully it's not such a big deal that I need to go rectify the few I've fixed wrongly. I'll stop doing it wrong :) Thanks, Hen On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found that it does have one

NOTICE.txt's in jars Was: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Henri Yandell
Doing resources resource includes includeNOTICE.txt/include /includes /resource /resources in the build kind of works. You get a NOTICE.txt in the jar, but it's not in the META-INF as the LICENSE.txt is. Is this important? Anyone got smart ideas

RE: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Eric Pugh
Developers List Subject: Re: [All] License change My screwup then. Hopefully it's not such a big deal that I need to go rectify the few I've fixed wrongly. I'll stop doing it wrong :) Thanks, Hen On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: P.S. The Board isn't kidding about the CLAs either - so if you haven't gotten them in, please do so. If you are having problems or questions, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] If they are not in you will a) have your commit privs suspended and b) it's possible code

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Henri Yandell
http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla.pdf ? Or does corporate cla mean one for an entire company? Hen On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: P.S. The Board isn't kidding about the CLAs either - so if you haven't gotten them in, please do so. If you are

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Henri Yandell wrote: http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla.pdf ? Or does corporate cla mean one for an entire company? Hen Yes it's for all contributions of a company, there is just a .txt version available on http://www.apache.org/licenses. Emmanuel

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Subject: Re: [All] License change My screwup then. Hopefully it's not such a big deal that I need to go rectify the few I've fixed wrongly. I'll stop doing it wrong :) Thanks, Hen On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Stephen Colebourne
My version of a license changer http://www.apache.org/~scolebourne/license/ Needs an IO build Stephen - Original Message - From: matthew.hawthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can someone post the script used to change the licenses in source files? I think Stephen posted it originally.

Re: [All] License change

2004-02-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I've just used the Java class in the committer module in CVS to convert FOP. Worked like a charm. Especially the test run mode is cool. On 27.02.2004 20:56:47 Stephen Colebourne wrote: My version of a license changer http://www.apache.org/~scolebourne/license/ Needs an IO build Jeremias