Hi.
This message is for jexl and beanutils folks.
I'm using both of them, as many people I presume.
Both of them share _almost_ the same syntax but for mapped access.
Jexl uses square brackets as bean.map[key] and beanUtils uses parentheses
bean.map(key)
To my opinion it could be a good idea to
shameless-plug
The Morph framework (morph.sourceforge.net) supports either syntax
out-of-the box. Morph had its first beta release yesterday.
For a comparison of Morph to JEXL, see
http://morph.sourceforge.net/alternatives/jexl.html
For a comparison of Morph to BeanUtils, see
Matt Sgarlata wrote:
shameless-plug
The Morph framework (morph.sourceforge.net) supports either syntax
out-of-the box. Morph had its first beta release yesterday.
For a comparison of Morph to JEXL, see
http://morph.sourceforge.net/alternatives/jexl.html
For a comparison of Morph to BeanUtils, see
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:25:21 +0100, marc lan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
This message is for jexl and beanutils folks.
I'm using both of them, as many people I presume.
Both of them share _almost_ the same syntax but for mapped access.
Jexl uses square brackets as bean.map[key] and
Seems reasonable. AFAIK, the JSP spec has changed to allow [] or () as
well, right?
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:25:21 +0100, marc lan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
This message is for jexl and beanutils folks.
I'm using both of them, as many people I presume.
Both of them share _almost_ the same
: marc lan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:37 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Jexl BeanUtils] Why not extend Jexl or beanutils to match
same map syntax ?
Matt Sgarlata wrote:
shameless-plug
The Morph framework (morph.sourceforge.net) supports
