Hi Neeme,
> In my view, it is better to have different projects specializing:
> * AXgen specializes in (reading in and modeling) XMI related stuff
AXgen uses NSUML to read in XMI.
AXgen is not able to do modeling. We use ArgoUML or Poseidon.
AXgen is just a simple combination of NSUML and Velocit
Axel Hohaus wrote:
Why using a second XML-scheme to generating all output (ddl,
ojb-classes, repository). XMI is also XML based description of all
nedded informations.
Using an existing project, like commons-sql, to individualize ddl's for
specific RDBMS and generating an simplified XML from Axg
> I think the projects are a little different - their main
> difference is what is the source of the generation process.
You are right!
> e.g. a single AXGen template could generate a commons-sql
> model from XMI so then AXGen users could take advantage of
> common-sql's ability to generate D
From: "Neeme Praks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm moving this thread from ojb-dev to commons-dev, as this list seems
> to be more appropriate for this discussion.
>
> > Axel Hohaus wrote:
> > >These two projects are just too similar in my mind and should
> > >join the
> > >efforts...(if authors can a
From: "Neeme Praks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Commons SQL!
>
> How about joining forces with AXgen project?
> (http://axgen.sourceforge.net)
>
> The easiest point of integration with AXgen would be to make a template
> for generating the database schema XML file (should be easy).
>
> Taking it furth
I'm moving this thread from ojb-dev to commons-dev, as this list seems
to be more appropriate for this discussion.
Axel Hohaus wrote:
>How about joining forces with Jakarta Commons SQL project?
>(http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/sql/)
it's an cool idea. We didn't know about Commons SQL
Hi Commons SQL!
How about joining forces with AXgen project?
(http://axgen.sourceforge.net)
The easiest point of integration with AXgen would be to make a template
for generating the database schema XML file (should be easy).
Taking it further, I think two projects could be merged, removing the
