Re: [VOTE][CLI] Release Plan 2.0

2004-08-23 Thread Rob Oxspring
Henri Yandell wrote: Looking at the site rather than the source. Would be nice if javadoc was a link rather than hidden down in the Project Reports. Go for it. I don't have the maven-foo and really don't have the patience to hack the maven config more than I have to. CLI2Converter confuses me. F

Re: [VOTE][CLI] Release Plan 2.0

2004-08-21 Thread Henri Yandell
Looking at the site rather than the source. Would be nice if javadoc was a link rather than hidden down in the Project Reports. CLI2Converter confuses me. Firstly, is it still needed? Secondly, why does it have return types of type: org.apache.commons.cli2.Group Would have thought you'd have ha

Re: [VOTE][CLI] Release Plan 2.0

2004-08-20 Thread Dion Gillard
+1. On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:44:28 +0100, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CLI2 has been far too long in the making and has been stable for a long > time so I'd like to propose a beta release to be followed up by some > documentation and a proper release. > > The open bugs mainly refer to

Re: [VOTE][CLI] Release Plan 2.0

2004-08-20 Thread John Keyes
Unfortunately I am still not in a position to contribute time to this. Thanks for all the hard work on v2 Rob. -John K On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:44:28 +0100, Rob Oxspring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CLI2 has been far too long in the making and has been stable for a long > time so I'd like to pro

[VOTE][CLI] Release Plan 2.0

2004-08-18 Thread Rob Oxspring
CLI2 has been far too long in the making and has been stable for a long time so I'd like to propose a beta release to be followed up by some documentation and a proper release. The open bugs mainly refer to 1.0 bugs that I'm nervous of fixing without breaking something else. Given that the 1.0