Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rahul, Let's do this now. If we find a problem, i can spin a 2.1 real quick. I'm fine with that (since you're doing all the work on the [modeler] release -- thanks for that, BTW). -Rahul thanks, dims

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Rahul, Let's do this now. If we find a problem, i can spin a 2.1 real quick. thanks, dims On 7/31/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/30/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul, > > i am going to leave the build.xml.* around for this time...I use the > maven1 prop

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/30/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rahul, i am going to leave the build.xml.* around for this time...I use the maven1 properties (maven.compile.source and maven.compile.target) to set the jdk version to 1.3. I will fix the build.xml. Depending upon the transitive closure

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-31 Thread Kevan Miller
My previous reply went direct to dims, instead of to this list. Here's my +1. --kevan On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:40 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around. Team, Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final? Here's my +1 to get th

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-30 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Rahul, i am going to leave the build.xml.* around for this time...I use the maven1 properties (maven.compile.source and maven.compile.target) to set the jdk version to 1.3. I will fix the build.xml. thanks, dims On 7/29/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around. Team, Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final? +1 Sigs, sums look good. Source rebuilds (m1). IMO, two nits worth fixing before cutting the release: *

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-25 Thread Bill Barker
+1 "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around. > > Team, > Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final? > > Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling. > > thanks, > dims > > On 7/22/06,

Re: [VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-25 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. I'm not concerned with having old versions of the javadoc on the site compared to getting a release out there. (Plus of course I believe in http://people.apache.org/~bayard/multidoc-jnr/). Hen On 7/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for

[VOTE][modeler] Promote 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final (was Re: [modeler] 2.0 RC1 ready for review)

2006-07-25 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thanks Rahul, will keep those in mind for the next time around. Team, Could i get some votes to promote the 2.0 RC1 to 2.0 Final? Here's my +1 to get the ball rolling. thanks, dims On 7/22/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/21/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O