+1
Stephen Colebourne
Robert Burrel Donkin
James Carmen
Phil Steitz
The vote passed, but not without debate.
I'll take this debate back to [collections], probably after Javapolis.
Stephen
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The [collections] component would like to split out a new commons proper
compo
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> ---
> [X] +1 I support creating [collection-functors]
> [ ] +0 It's OK
> [ ] +1 If you must
> [ ] -1 I don't support this because
> ---
- robert
-
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:17 -0500, Michael Heuer wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:09 +, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > > +1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called
> > > collections-functors).
> > >
> > > Rational:
> > > I think functors ar
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:09 +, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > +1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called
> > collections-functors).
> >
> > Rational:
> > I think functors are a powerful approach to software design, under
> > represented (in jav
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:09 +, Tim Roberts wrote:
> +1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called
> collections-functors).
>
> Rational:
> I think functors are a powerful approach to software design, under
> represented (in java) and non-standardised. I would like to se
source community stuff so apologies for any
mistakes/inappropriate actions (such as voting on this change).
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2005 01:13
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New commons proper compone
ch as voting on this change).
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2005 01:13
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors
Reissued ballot paper as I can't
On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new component is [collection-functors], so there
> should be no confusion.
Ok, you're right, that would be clear.
> I do expect different release cycles going forward.
> There is only a small tie between the two bits of code
> (4 in
--- Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TransformerUtils -> [collection-functors]
> > PredicateUtils -> [collection-functors]
> > ClosureUtils -> [collection-functors]
> > FactoryUtils -> [collection-functors]
> >
> > Transfor
On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
> > So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
> > Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
> > package or go into the new component?
>
> TransformerUtils ->
On 11/28/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
> > So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
> > Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
> > package or go into the new component?
>
> TransformerUtils ->
James Carman wrote:
So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
package or go into the new component?
TransformerUtils -> [collection-functors]
PredicateUtils -> [collection-functors]
ClosureUti
Reissued ballot paper as I can't use Ctrl+C...
---
[ ] +1 I support creating [collection-functors]
[ ] +0 It's OK
[ ] -0 If you must
[ ] -1 I don't support this because
---
Stephen
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The [collections] component would like to spli
:12 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors
The [collections] component would like to split out a new commons proper
component, [collection-functors]. This component will be created
directly in commons proper, not the sandbox as it
On 11/28/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The [collections] component would like to split out a new commons proper
> component, [collection-functors]. This component will be created
> directly in commons proper, not the sandbox as it contains code
> previously released. The prima
James Carman: +1
Did you mean "-0 If you must"?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 6:12 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors
The [c
The [collections] component would like to split out a new commons proper
component, [collection-functors]. This component will be created
directly in commons proper, not the sandbox as it contains code
previously released. The primary motivations are to reduce to amount of
code held within [col
17 matches
Mail list logo
