> ---
> Vote: Commons Validator 1.1.1 Release
> [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
> [X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
> [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
> [ ]
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
> Voting will end Sunday December 21, 12 Noon.
> ---
> Vote: Commons Validator 1.1.1 Release
> [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
> [ ] +0 I am in favor of the
+1
David
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the moment I have withdrawn commons-validator, and we'll take a vote
> on its release, see bottom.
>
>
> The following release plan is proposed for Validator 1.1.0:
>
> * /Tag Date/ - Tuesday, December 15, 2003, 02:00:00 EST
>
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Vote: Commons Validator 1.1.1 Release
[ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
[ ] -1 I am against this proposal (must include a reason).
Quest
Vote: Commons Validator 1.1.1 Release
[ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
[ ] -1 I am against this proposal (must include a reason).
Questions:
Did you read htt
For the moment I have withdrawn commons-validator, and we'll take a vote
on its release, see bottom.
The following release plan is proposed for Validator 1.1.0:
* /Tag Date/ - Tuesday, December 15, 2003, 02:00:00 EST
* /Release Manager/ - Robert Leland
* /Alpha Release Announcement/ - To
Robert Leland wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi rob
could you remember to cc the pmc next time?
Thanks, and I will do that next time. I just sent out an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I ment to say [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks again,
Rob
every release needs to be approved and this is the mo
robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi rob
could you remember to cc the pmc next time?
Thanks, and I will do that next time. I just sent out an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks again,
Rob
every release needs to be approved and this is the most convenient way
to make sure any pmc folks who aren't s
Henri Yandell wrote:
I never meant you didn't count ! I also see what you mean about other
commons committers
being more important, since they tend to be more objective when they do
speak up.
-Rob
Heh.
I always took it the other way. +1 votes from the project itself are
non-binding and +1 vot
Btw, you might want to hold off on this Robert until the daedalus to
minotaur translation is done. I think there'll be a note to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] soon.
Hen
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
> I counted 2 +1 binding votes,
> and 1 +1 votes from another commons committer.
> I wi
hi rob
could you remember to cc the pmc next time?
every release needs to be approved and this is the most convenient way to
make sure any pmc folks who aren't subscribed to commons-dev get the
chance to veto.
BTW the usual convention in the commons is to prefix [RESULT] to emails of
this kin
I counted 2 +1 binding votes,
and 1 +1 votes from another commons committer.
I will cut the release tonight, test it, and upload it to the mirrors
sometime this week.
-Rob
+1
David
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
> ---
> > Vote: Commons Validator 1.1.0 Release
> > [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
> > [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to
+1
Will be interested in seeing how the httpd release system adds difference
to a Commons project.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
> ---
> Vote: Commons Validator 1.1.0 Release
> [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release,
Commons Validator has recently undergone refactoring with a few bugs
fixed and documentation updates.
The following release plan is proposed for Validator 1.1.0:
* /Tag Date/ - Tuesday, August 25, 2003, 23:59:59
* /Release Manager/ - Robert Leland
* /Alpha Release Announcement/ - To the f
15 matches
Mail list logo
