Quoting Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I suggested a new orientation for [cache] earlier this month but it
> hasn't received much feedback :
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg31432.html
>
> The idea was to turn it into an abstraction layer for cache
> implementations
Re: [cache] project status query...To be honest, I think an abstraction
versus yet another implmentation would be more useful. Currently I can
count off maybe 10 or 15 different implementations of caching, all a bit
different.. Unless commons cache has something that makes it special, I
I suggested a new orientation for [cache] earlier this month but it
hasn't received much feedback :
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg31432.html
The idea was to turn it into an abstraction layer for cache
implementations just like commons logging for logging implementations.
Any
On 22-Dec-03, at 19:53 Uhr, Hernan Silberman wrote:
I'm interested to know the status of the cache sandbox project. Looks
very
nice, I'd like to know if it's being actively worked on and how mature
the code
is. I noticed there are no builds available and not much
documentation yet so I
though
I'm interested to know the status of the cache sandbox project. Looks very
nice, I'd like to know if it's being actively worked on and how mature the code
is. I noticed there are no builds available and not much documentation yet so I
thought I'd ask the list.
thanks!
Hernan
--
