Martin Cooper wrote on Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:06 PM:
On 12/10/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using profiles to provide two different options makes perfect sense
to me. I see no need to proscribe a one size fits all
On 12/10/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Duplicating the most important part of the POM (and maintaining both
source and duplicate in the future) seems to me to be bad practice, at
least if you aren't forced to do it. I do not see that we are forced.
snap/
Missing
On 12/11/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote on Sunday, December 10, 2006 11:06 PM:
snip/
I didn't say anything about duplicating anything. Why can't
we split out the
scp-related part into separate profiles, one for scp and one for
scpexe? That way, you could
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mvn -Prc deploy
Folks like me and Hen can use:
mvn -Pextrc deploy
Would the extrc profile be a copy of the rc profile, with the wagon
type as an exception? If so, then I'd be -1 for it. The rc profile
does more than simply providing a
We may need separate profiles for PuTTY users in commons-parent?
IIUC, the decision of choosing a wagon provider depends on the snaps
repo URL, so we would need a scpexe:// URL to get the Wagon SSH
External Provider (thereby we can use plink etc.). Anyone got a better
handle on this?
-Rahul
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We may need separate profiles for PuTTY users in commons-parent?
Why do you want to use putty? The wagon scp protocol has, IMO, the
charm that it doesn't depend on any external programs. Additionally,
it has the advantage that deploying with
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We may need separate profiles for PuTTY users in commons-parent?
Why do you want to use putty? The wagon scp protocol has, IMO, the
charm that it doesn't depend on any external programs.
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We may need separate profiles for PuTTY users in commons-parent?
Why do you want to use putty? The wagon scp protocol has, IMO, the
charm that it doesn't depend on any external programs.
On 12/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using scpexe (on *nix) in Archiva to do deploys because I couldn't
get the scp method to work with sshagent.
Sorry for asking dumb question, but what does that mean? Is it
something what jsch cannot do?
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
On 12/8/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to use my existing Pageant keys when on Windoze (and
additionally, I don't want cygwin).
Sorry for asking more dumb questions: What are Pageant keys? I am
using private keys
Pageant/sshagent are the same thing.
Basically we type our passphrases in once when the OS comes up and
from that point on we can ssh/scp to machines without having to enter
passwords/passphrases.
Hen
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL
On 12/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically we type our passphrases in once when the OS comes up and
from that point on we can ssh/scp to machines without having to enter
passwords/passphrases.
I admit that I still do not completely understand the details, but I
do understand
On 12/8/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically we type our passphrases in once when the OS comes up and
from that point on we can ssh/scp to machines without having to enter
passwords/passphrases.
I admit that I still do not
13 matches
Mail list logo
