On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 01:51 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Emma is an Apache licensed alternative that I haven't used.
i've used emma and it works fine
the reports aren't as pretty, though
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Oliver Heger wrote:
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems, especially with inner classes. So I
On 1/4/06, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Dudziak wrote:
>
> > What would be the reason for that ? The reports are not covered by the
> > Clover license unless they contain a significant part of the source of
> > Clover (quite unlikely). Therefore, we should be able to publish t
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
What would be the reason for that ? The reports are not covered by the
Clover license unless they contain a significant part of the source of
Clover (quite unlikely). Therefore, we should be able to publish them
without any problems. The same problem would btw. apply to Cob
On 1/4/06, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Heger wrote:
> >
> > With clover there seem to be some licensing issues:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37454
>
> We have an open source license for Clover, it works for the org.apache.*
> packages only. I'm no
Oliver Heger wrote:
With clover there seem to be some licensing issues:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37454
We have an open source license for Clover, it works for the org.apache.*
packages only. I'm not sure this allows us to redistribute it though.
https://svn.apache.
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
>> code coverage reports.
>>
>> I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
>> configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
>> prob
Oliver Heger wrote:
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems, especially with inner classes. So I
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems, especially with inner classes. So I would suggest switchin
