Writing up an incubator proposal. Asked on the incubator list again
(hopefully more concisely) on whether we need to incubate or just get
a stamp of approval for the donated code.
Have attached early draft.
Hen
On 8/4/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suck, sorry. I completely
I suck, sorry. I completely missed Stefan's reply and then vanished
into moping around with a sinus infection/headaches.
I'll write up a proposal.
So, on the committer list:
Steven Caswell
Henri Yandell
Urs Hardegger (is he interested Stefan?)
Stefan Rufer (are you interested Stefan?)
Anyone
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
2) Who are our initial list of committers? Any Commons committer; do
the original authors wish to be committers on the codebase? Are Simon
Hefti and Ronnie Brunner prospective committers?
I can provide the facts from our side here:
The original
I have an interest in the outcome so I'm willing to volunteer my time
and efforts.
On 7/13/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 21:37 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 7/7/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:15 -0400,
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 21:37 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 7/7/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:15 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
snip
So my proposal is that we submit Netcetera's CSV library to the ASF
Incubator, with Jakarta (more
On 7/7/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:15 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
snip
So my proposal is that we submit Netcetera's CSV library to the ASF
Incubator, with Jakarta (more correctly Jakarta Commons) acting as the
sponsoring project. (I'd be
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:15 -0400, Henri Yandell wrote:
snip
So my proposal is that we submit Netcetera's CSV library to the ASF
Incubator, with Jakarta (more correctly Jakarta Commons) acting as the
sponsoring project. (I'd be happy to volunteer to be mentor the
project). While in the
Sounds like a good approach to me. I'm definitely +1 and hope to have
some cycles to help with the unit tests.
On 6/30/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/05, Stefan Rufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dare to come back to the Creating a CSV component thread where the
discussion
On 6/27/05, Stefan Rufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dare to come back to the Creating a CSV component thread where the
discussion has starved a bit during the last weeks:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200506.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Summary:
So far
I dare to come back to the Creating a CSV component thread where the
discussion has starved a bit during the last weeks:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/200506.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Summary:
So far I've found the following oppinions concerning CSV as an own
My +1
paul
Le 27 juin 05, à 13:31, Stefan Rufer a écrit :
I dare to come back to the Creating a CSV component thread where the
discussion has starved a bit during the last weeks:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-commons-dev/
200506.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summary:
So
Didn't someone submit a CVS implementation to [codec] a while back? It was
sitting in a Bugzilla ticket last time I checked.
Kevin Gessner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=20
Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io]
Didn't someone submit a CVS implementation to [codec] a while back? It was
sitting in a Bugzilla ticket last time I checked.
Kevin Gessner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
=20
Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io]
I must say that I agree with Henri that this merits its own component.
IMO it doesn't fit into [lang] and would look strange within [io] or
[codec]. CSV is a topic that comes up every now and then and if this
could be solved once and for all then a separate component would be
justified if only for
I'm also +1 to a separate [csv] component for the reasons already conveyed.
On 6/9/05, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say that I agree with Henri that this merits its own component.
IMO it doesn't fit into [lang] and would look strange within [io] or
[codec]. CSV is a topic
Steven Caswell wrote:
I'm also +1 to a separate [csv] component for the reasons already conveyed.
also think it's worth a separate component
cheers
--
Torsten
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thought I'd summarise the CSV threads on the user list. Due to the
high level of user activity in those threads, I've mailed this to both
user and dev lists. Interested users should probably hop over to the
dev list at some point as I imagine future threads will consolidate
there.
Basic idea is
On 6/8/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Another question is where the code should go. [lang] and [io] have
been suggested, as has a [csv] component. I'll go as far as to say
that [csv] is the direction we should go and see if anybody disagrees
:)
Some sort of CVS utility
18 matches
Mail list logo
