On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Ola Berg wrote:
> Comments inline
> >
> > (1.5) interaction with other packages
> >
> > Functor's dependencies upon other components and external libraries should
> > be minimal.
>
> ...or 'none'? or 'absolutely minimal'? I think that a separate Functor
> package will fail sho
Comments inline
> =
> [DRAFT] Proposal for a Functor Component
>
> (0) rationale
>
> A "functor" is an entity which serves the role of a function but can be
> operated upon like an object [Wiki]. It is a common object oriented
> design idiom. For exa
Henri wrote:
> I can't fault much of your proposal document. It's well put together and
> if functor were to be a separate package, would serve well.
+1
> I am worried that there is a time/cost to pay for lots of small components
> which have to be release managed, bug managed, documented and chec
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> In part of the discussion of his recent proposal, Stephen Coleburn wrote:
>
> > I am trying to move forward _now_. Creating
> > [functor] would involve a sandbox project,
> > moving the code again (effectively
> > recreating [pattern]), a strong poss
In part of the discussion of his recent proposal, Stephen Coleburn wrote:
> I am trying to move forward _now_. Creating
> [functor] would involve a sandbox project,
> moving the code again (effectively
> recreating [pattern]), a strong possibility
> of a one-man project, thus no possibility
> of p
