As was pointed out to me by a user, I mistakenly wrote the constructor
of the FileSystemUtils as public, where it whould be private as it is
suppoed to disallow instantiation of the classm as the comment says...
just a brainfart I guess :)
Unless anyone thinks it should be left public in case
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
As was pointed out to me by a user, I mistakenly wrote the constructor
of the FileSystemUtils as public, where it whould be private as it is
suppoed to disallow instantiation of the classm as the comment says...
just a brainfart I guess :)
Unless anyone thinks it
Ok, cool, I didn't know non-private constructors was a general
requirement. Thanks for the heads-up.
Frank
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
As was pointed out to me by a user, I mistakenly wrote the constructor
of the FileSystemUtils as public, where it whould be private
