Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-24 Thread dion
Yep, that bug was fixed in RC1. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ __matthewHawthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2003 01:22:38 AM: > I've had this happen when I had references to ${basedir} in the > project.xml. I think this is su

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Nope, I guess not. > > On 23.11.2003 10:34:38 Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > As the site is using maven, is there any need to keep the old build > > system? [build.properties, build.properties.sample, build.xml] > > > > It'll only get out of date

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-24 Thread __matthewHawthorne
I've had this happen when I had references to ${basedir} in the project.xml. I think this is supposed to be fixed in maven 1.0-rc1? Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've gone ahead and done this. One thing that you have to be aware of is t

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've gone ahead and done this. One thing that you have to be aware of is that under some - unknown to me - circumstances "maven ant" puts strange, absolute (specifc to your machine) paths into the generated build file. See

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread dion
Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/11/2003 09:54:45 PM: > Right. How are other commons projects handling that? Maven claims to > integrate with Gump but still, I see quite a few projects still having a > build.xml and some having a (generated) build-gump.xml. Any > recommendations?

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
ias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 10:54 AM > > Subject: Re: [io] remove old ant build system > > > > > > > Right. How are other commons projects h

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread David Graham
ephen > > - Original Message - > From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 10:54 AM > Subject: Re: [io] remove old ant build system >

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Right. How are other commons projects handling that? Maven claims to integrate with Gump but still, I see quite a few projects still having a build.xml and some having a (generated) build-gump.xml. Any recommendations? On 23.11.2003 11:36:37 Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Doesn't gump use ant? > Step

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Doesn't gump use ant? Stephen - Original Message - From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Nope, I guess not. > > On 23.11.2003 10:34:38 Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > As the site is using maven, is there any need to keep the old build > > system? [build.properties, build.proper

Re: [io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Nope, I guess not. On 23.11.2003 10:34:38 Henri Yandell wrote: > > As the site is using maven, is there any need to keep the old build > system? [build.properties, build.properties.sample, build.xml] > > It'll only get out of date if maven is the main build system [and vice > versa]. Jeremi

[io] remove old ant build system

2003-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
As the site is using maven, is there any need to keep the old build system? [build.properties, build.properties.sample, build.xml] It'll only get out of date if maven is the main build system [and vice versa]. Hen - To uns