The offending line in JexlTest has been removed. If you want the size of
an array, call "size()". Now, on to the next target.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/junit-report.html#JexlTest
testNotConditionsWithDots is failing. Specifically, the following code
fails:
Expression e = Expre
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 13:51, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> I think that just using size() is the right way to go.
The only reason I can see to support foo.length for arrays is if the JSP
expression language supports it, on the basis that Jexl claims to be an
extension of the JSP expression langua
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:00 AM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 07:51, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:25 AM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 06:58, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I guess we were going to figure out if we want to add the art
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 07:51, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:25 AM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 06:58, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >> I guess we were going to figure out if we want to add the artificial
> >> notion of the length field, or just as
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:25 AM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 06:58, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I guess we were going to figure out if we want to add the artificial
notion of the length field, or just ask people to use size().
'length'
is really weird, as it doesn't really
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 06:58, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I guess we were going to figure out if we want to add the artificial
> notion of the length field, or just ask people to use size(). 'length'
> is really weird, as it doesn't really exist as a field, and only
> applies to arrays.
>
>
I guess we were going to figure out if we want to add the artificial
notion of the length field, or just ask people to use size(). 'length'
is really weird, as it doesn't really exist as a field, and only
applies to arrays.
Why confuse the syntax with an additional way to get size?
geir
O
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 03:28, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> JexlTest line 443: "assertExpression(jc, "array.length", new Integer(5));"
>
> This is failing because (from what I'm seeing), length isn't given any special
> treatment in Parser.jjt.
>
> Any ideas?
I proposed the attached fix a few months bac
JexlTest line 443: "assertExpression(jc, "array.length", new Integer(5));"
This is failing because (from what I'm seeing), length isn't given any special
treatment in Parser.jjt.
Any ideas?
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
