__matthewHawthorne wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
__matthewHawthorne wrote:
Instead of removing it, is it possible to modify the test to "expect"
the failure? I'm not familiar with the test or class that you're
speaking of, but sometimes it's nice to keep tests like this around.
Maybe catch an e
Phil Steitz wrote:
__matthewHawthorne wrote:
Instead of removing it, is it possible to modify the test to "expect"
the failure? I'm not familiar with the test or class that you're
speaking of, but sometimes it's nice to keep tests like this around.
Maybe catch an expected RuntimeException, o
__matthewHawthorne wrote:
Instead of removing it, is it possible to modify the test to "expect"
the failure? I'm not familiar with the test or class that you're
speaking of, but sometimes it's nice to keep tests like this around.
Maybe catch an expected RuntimeException, or change an assertTrue
Original Message-
> From: __matthewHawthorne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 16:05
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] JUnit version, broken tests
>
> Instead of removing it, is it possible to modify the test to "expect"
gt;
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:45 PM
Subject: [lang] JUnit version, broken tests
Some tests (/builder/ShortPrefixToStringStyleTest, ArrayUtils.Test) have
been been added/modified to require Junit 3.8. I have no problem with
this; but we need to modify the dependency in project.xml for t
roken"
behavior) under 1.4.2, I would like to remove it. Any objections to this?
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:45 PM
S
+1 to JUnit 3.8.1
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 13:55
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [lang] JUnit version, broken tests
>
> +1, enough time has now passed
+1, enough time has now passed for JUnit3.8 to be OK
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:45 PM
Subject: [lang] JUnit vers
Some tests (/builder/ShortPrefixToStringStyleTest, ArrayUtils.Test) have
been been added/modified to require Junit 3.8. I have no problem with
this; but we need to modify the dependency in project.xml for the maven
build to work in this case. Any objections to this change?
I am seeing the fol
