Simon Kitching wrote on Thursday, February 23, 2006 6:17 AM:
[snip]
> Assuming that some Avalon loggers are *not* serializable then
> there are
> two problems.
None of it implement Serializable, so your assumption is right. Since they
don't have a default ctor they also cannot be the base of a
These two issues *can* be sort-of worked around by my proposed option
(c). However I don't really like the idea of silently disabling
logging.
Me neither :-/
In short, I believe that Avalon logging in general, and the JCL
AvalonLogger in particular are not designed to handle serialization
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 13:07 +1100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > Here are the options I can see:
> > (a) remove AvalonLogger from the JCL 1.1 distribution.
>
> N ...bad idea IMO. We would have to deprecate it first.
Ok.
>
> > (b) remove Serializable marker interface from AvalonLogger
>
> It's p
Here are the options I can see:
(a) remove AvalonLogger from the JCL 1.1 distribution.
N ...bad idea IMO. We would have to deprecate it first.
(b) remove Serializable marker interface from AvalonLogger
It's probably the best to fix it in the Avalon code.
It's old, it's becoming reviled
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:59 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
> The Log4JLogger class appears to work correctly, because it implements
> getLogger like this:
> public Logger getLogger() {
> if (logger == null) {
> logger = Logger.getLogger(name);
> }
> return (th
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 23:58 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
> Craig Mcc has also confirmed it looks broken to him.
yep, broke
> Here are the options I can see:
> (a) remove AvalonLogger from the JCL 1.1 distribution.
> (b) remove Serializable marker interface from AvalonLogger
> (c) on deserialize,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:59 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been checking whether all the standard Log adapter classes are
> Serializable. The Avalon logger declares itself to be Serializable, but
> my reading of the code indicates this won't work. Can someone
> confirm/deny this?
I'v
On 2/20/06, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been checking whether all the standard Log adapter classes are
> Serializable. The Avalon logger declares itself to be Serializable, but
> my reading of the code indicates this won't work. Can someone
> confirm/deny this?
I su
Hi,
I've been checking whether all the standard Log adapter classes are
Serializable. The Avalon logger declares itself to be Serializable, but
my reading of the code indicates this won't work. Can someone
confirm/deny this?
The javadoc has this:
* Note: AvalonLogger implements
* Serializable f
