On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 17:19 +1000, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > The documentation for 1.1 makes it clear that the -api.jar has no real
> > purpose, and should generally be avoided. Hopefully we can encourage the
> > next tomcat release to include the full JCL 1.1 jar.
> >
> > The price paid is just mil
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 17:19 +1000, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> As for the inclusion:
> as long as we clearly state that the use from the API jar is deprecated
> and it will be gone (from the API jar) in the next release it should be ok.
>
> ...at some stage we should just fix this.
Well, I expect 1.1
> The documentation for 1.1 makes it clear that the -api.jar has no real
> purpose, and should generally be avoided. Hopefully we can encourage the
> next tomcat release to include the full JCL 1.1 jar.
>
> The price paid is just mild offense to purists, who *are* correct that
> this class doesn't
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:16 +1000, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> On 4/6/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :)
> > >
> > > we no long ship the jdk logger in API jar. however, tomcat uses jdk
> > > logger as it's d
On 4/6/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :)
> >
> > we no long ship the jdk logger in API jar. however, tomcat uses jdk
> > logger as it's default. so, by excluding the jdk logger, JCL 1.1 is no
> > longer a
robert burrell donkin wrote:
remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :)
we no long ship the jdk logger in API jar. however, tomcat uses jdk
logger as it's default. so, by excluding the jdk logger, JCL 1.1 is no
longer a drop in replacement at least for tomcat.
so, i thought it'd be a good ti
I am in favor of putting it back (don't consider this "binding" though). Being able to be a drop in
replacement of previous versions is pretty important for logging I think..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :)
we no long ship the jdk logger
remy ran a regression test for RC6 (thanks :)
we no long ship the jdk logger in API jar. however, tomcat uses jdk
logger as it's default. so, by excluding the jdk logger, JCL 1.1 is no
longer a drop in replacement at least for tomcat.
so, i thought it'd be a good time to reconsider the decision t
