On Tue, 27 May 2003, Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires
>>a fee and/or specific permission.
>>
> Basically what this is saying is "talk to us".
Yep, but it would also say that to people republishing the Apache code
that republishes or copies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires
a fee and/or specific permission.
Basically what this is saying is "talk to us". ACM
is suggesting
involvement and acknowledgment of their efforts in
organizing and
arc
> "Mark R. Diggory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires
> >a fee and/or specific permission.
> >
> Basically what this is saying is "talk to us". ACM
> is suggesting
> involvement and acknowledgment of their efforts in
> organizing and
> archiving these a
I caution at assuming this is 'restrictive'. I would like to point out
an important clause in this license that you should consider, I've
received emails from ACM members who are following our project (I am
actually an inactive ACM member myself). ACM is a member based
organization just like Ap
