On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 22:44 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > happier developing at joda or would you prefer see that code as the
> > basis for a commons primitives 2?
> It could be commons primitives 2, but as the API would be rather
> different it would seem di
robert burrell donkin wrote:
happier developing at joda or would you prefer see that code as the
basis for a commons primitives 2?
It could be commons primitives 2, but as the API would be rather
different it would seem difficult to explain to our users. Having the
separate codebase would thus
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 00:25 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >>A release was suggested, but there is no-one around to actually do it.
> >
> > what actually needs doing?
> > (other than the mechanics, of course)
>
> [primitives] is a strange component. I am the de
robert burrell donkin wrote:
A release was suggested, but there is no-one around to actually do it.
what actually needs doing?
(other than the mechanics, of course)
[primitives] is a strange component. I am the de facto maintainer as its
linked to collections, yet I disagree with the fundame
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 23:51 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > the int map stuff has been stalled for the last week but i hope to be
> > able to get back on track sometime this week. i know that a new
> > primitives release is pencilled in without int map but i'd li
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the int map stuff has been stalled for the last week but i hope to be
able to get back on track sometime this week. i know that a new
primitives release is pencilled in without int map but i'd like to get
the API's out there for feedback without waiting too long.
i s
the int map stuff has been stalled for the last week but i hope to be
able to get back on track sometime this week. i know that a new
primitives release is pencilled in without int map but i'd like to get
the API's out there for feedback without waiting too long.
i see a couple of reasonable optio
