PM
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: [proxy] vs proxytoys
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> It's failing on the call to scp:
>
> [exec] [VERBOSE] Current OS is Windows XP
> [exec] [VERBOSE] Executing 'scp' with arguments:
> 'commons-proxy-0.
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> It's failing on the call to scp:
>
> [exec] [VERBOSE] Current OS is Windows XP
> [exec] [VERBOSE] Executing 'scp' with arguments:
> 'commons-proxy-0.1-site.tar.gz'
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/proxy/'
>
> The ' characters a
the executable and arguments are
not part of the command.
[exec] xfree: NULL pointer given as argument
[exec] lost connection
[exec] [ERROR] Result: 1
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:12 AM
To: Jakarta Commons De
Hi James,
I just realized form your output, that you must have changed this locally.
Try running maven with -X option and see if there's a problem reported.
- Jörg
Jörg Schaible wrote on Friday, August 26, 2005 5:10 PM:
> I checked the project.xml that is in subversion and you have
> to make p
I checked the project.xml that is in subversion and you have to make proper
values for the following entries (taken from sandbox/id):
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&bug_status=__open__&prod
uct=Commons&content=id
cvs.apache.org
/www/jakarta.apache.or
et\commons-proxy-0.1-site.tar.gz
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 6 seconds
Finished at: Fri Aug 26 11:00:22 EDT 2005
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [proxy] vs proxytoys
James Ca
James Carman wrote on Friday, August 26, 2005 4:51 PM:
> I met all of the qualifications, but my site:sshdeploy fails...
>
> site:sshdeploy:
> [echo]
> siteAddress = cvs.apache.org
> siteDirectory = /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/proxy/
should go to /www/jakarta.apache.org/com
6 10:49:33 EDT 2005
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:15 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [proxy] vs proxytoys
On 8/26/05, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I actually get the g
On 8/26/05, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I actually get the generated site to be viewable when you go to...
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/proxy
See "Updating the public site" on [
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/building.html ]
-Rahul
James Carman wrote on Friday, August 26, 2005 2:02 PM:
> Jörg (is that pronounced "yorg" or "george"?),
"yerk" seems closest
:)
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
rom: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:18 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [proxy] vs proxytoys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> That's one thing that I could definitely use help
Developers List
Subject: RE: [proxy] vs proxytoys
Joerg Hohwiller wrote on Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:18 PM:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi James,
>
> James Carman wrote:
>> That's one thing that I could definitely use help with
>&g
Joerg Hohwiller wrote on Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:18 PM:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi James,
>
> James Carman wrote:
>> That's one thing that I could definitely use help with
>> ("mavenization"). I'm not at all familiar with what it takes to get a
>> project set u
ssage-
From: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:18 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [proxy] vs proxytoys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> That's one thing that I could d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> That's one thing that I could definitely use help with ("mavenization").
> I'm not at all familiar with what it takes to get a project set up with
> Gump, Maven, and all the other stuff.
Promise is promise:
I made it a
riginal Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:32 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [proxy] vs proxytoys
To be quite honest, nobody has fully provided the JavassistProxyFactory
implementation to commons-
James Carman wrote on Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:09 AM:
> Jörg,
>
> Out of curiosity, what is the (real-life) use case where you
> would actually have a proxy object which doesn't delegate to
> some implementation? I'm not saying there isn't one. I may
> very well be just too ignorant to come
null (extended
ConstantProvider) and could be the target for that type of proxy.
James
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:49 PM
To: James Carman
Cc: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: Re: [proxy] vs p
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 23:32, James Carman wrote:
JC> To be quite honest, nobody has fully provided the JavassistProxyFactory
JC> implementation to commons-proxy yet, either. :-) I started on it but
JC> couldn't get the intercepted proxies working.
:))
JC> One key difference, it seems, be
lower than commons-proxy
using this crude test (I'm not saying these are the best metrics in the
world). Again, I allowed both implementations to use a CGLIB-based proxy.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
Sent: Wednesday, August 24
Joerg Hohwiller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi James,
> Hi there,
>>
>> can you tell me, what you are missing with proxytoys? You announced to
>> have a closer look , but did not write anything further.
> It seems to be true that proxytoys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> I didn't understand what you meant by your question:
>
> why do you call the methods "object" there?
>
> What methods are you talking about? Do you mean the getObject() method on
> the ObjectProvider interface. Well
rom: Joerg Hohwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 4:21 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [proxy] vs proxytoys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi James,
Hi there,
>
> can you tell me, what you are missin
August 23, 2005 4:21 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [proxy] vs proxytoys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi James,
Hi there,
>
> can you tell me, what you are missing with proxytoys? You announced to
have
> a closer look , bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi James,
Hi there,
>
> can you tell me, what you are missing with proxytoys? You announced to have
> a closer look , but did not write anything further.
It seems to be true that proxytoys and "commons-proxy" are quite similar
Hi James,
can you tell me, what you are missing with proxytoys? You announced to have
a closer look , but did not write anything further.
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
26 matches
Mail list logo
