OK I'm going to stop trying to swim against the flow.
Niall
On 3/16/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > Another problem is the new "commons" menus doesn't work with distros
> > that include their site with the docs - I just checked commons logging
> >
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Another problem is the new "commons" menus doesn't work with distros
> that include their site with the docs - I just checked commons logging
> and none of the commons entries work - it needs to be changed to
> absolute urls, rather than relative.
I chose relative URLs del
I have implemented an alternative approach in Validator that uses an
svn:external to pull in the commons-build.
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/msg76982.html
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=386450&view=rev
I set up a new "shared-build" directory in commons-build
OK I fixed this and uploaded a new version.
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386376&view=rev
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:08 PM
Another problem is the new "commons" menus doesn't work with distros
that include
On 3/16/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/15/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
> > at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
> > and [betwixt] are done, plus
Another problem is the new "commons" menus doesn't work with distros
that include their site with the docs - I just checked commons logging
and none of the commons entries work - it needs to be changed to
absolute urls, rather than relative.
Niall
On 3/16/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Also -1 to having the docs depend on javascript.
I am also -1 (PMC binding vote)
--
James Mitchell
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
Skype: jmitchtx
On Mar 16, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 3/15/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Progres
On 3/15/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
> at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
> and [betwixt] are done, plus [pool] unpublished.
>
>
> I believe that I may have an even sn
Commons Jexl done.
On 3/16/06, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 00:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
> > at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
> > a
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 00:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
> at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
> and [betwixt] are done, plus [pool] unpublished.
>
>
Commons [HttpClient] converted
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Colebourne wrote on Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:12 AM:
> Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along
> nicley. So far
> at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
> and [betwixt] are done, plus [pool] unpublished.
>
>
> I believe tha
Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
and [betwixt] are done, plus [pool] unpublished.
I believe that I may have an even sneakier way to handle the shared menu
part however. This is a med
12 matches
Mail list logo
