On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 01:51 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
snip
Emma is an Apache licensed alternative that I haven't used.
i've used emma and it works fine
the reports aren't as pretty, though
- robert
-
To unsubscribe,
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems, especially with inner classes. So I would suggest
Oliver Heger wrote:
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems, especially with inner classes. So I
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Oliver Heger wrote:
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems
://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/clover/
Covertura looks fine for the source packages we release. However when I
work on the code coverage I appreciate the more detailed information
provided by Clover. We can use both tools: Clover privately for the
coverage work, and Covertura
/donated-licenses/clover/
Covertura looks fine for the source packages we release. However when I
work on the code coverage I appreciate the more detailed information
provided by Clover. We can use both tools: Clover privately for the
coverage work, and Covertura for the public reports.
What
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
What would be the reason for that ? The reports are not covered by the
Clover license unless they contain a significant part of the source of
Clover (quite unlikely). Therefore, we should be able to publish them
without any problems. The same problem would btw. apply to
On 1/4/06, Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
What would be the reason for that ? The reports are not covered by the
Clover license unless they contain a significant part of the source of
Clover (quite unlikely). Therefore, we should be able to publish them
Oliver Heger wrote:
I noticed several projects recently switching to cobertura for their
code coverage reports.
I tried cobertura, too, and was very content with the results. ATM in
configuration we use jcoverage, but this product seems to have some
problems, especially with inner classes. So I
Please, sorry by my ignorance but, what is unit test code coverage?? This
is different than the traditional unit test?
Woody
''-- Mensagem Original --
''Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
''Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 06:52:28 +0200
''To: commons-dev
At 2005-04-19 15:22, you wrote:
Please, sorry by my ignorance but, what is unit test code coverage?? This
is different than the traditional unit test?
Those are not separate tests, but tools that help you see how much of your
code that is actually tested by your unit tests. Testing is pretty
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original Message
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org;commons-dev@jakarta.apache.orgSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:22
AMSubject: RE: Code coveragePlease, sorry by my ignorance but, what is unit test code coverage?? Thisis
On 4/19/05, Mattias J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an Apache standard for unit test code coverage?
It seems some projects use Clover and others jcoverage. Personally I have
experience with Emma (http://emma.sourceforge.net/).
If I want to add code coverage to a Commons project, is either
Hi Henri,
Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:25 PM:
[snip]
Emma's obviously the nicest to use from a free point of view.
JCoverage has a feature-limited GPL version while Clover has
a free for open-source projects version, so they're about the
same on the 'free' barometer for
WHERE ?
in the emma download section ;-) : plugins-testing
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=108932
Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This looks cool, but the license may be a bit restrictive...
http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/05, Mattias J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an Apache standard for unit test code coverage?
It seems some projects use Clover and others
Is there an Apache standard for unit test code coverage?
It seems some projects use Clover and others jcoverage. Personally I have
experience with Emma (http://emma.sourceforge.net/).
If I want to add code coverage to a Commons project, is either of these
preferrable?
Mattias Jiderhamn
17 matches
Mail list logo
