Hi,
I tried simper, I think it is good idea for web applications,
It must be stable, because it very simple.
But I need more complex in my projects, EJB too complex :(.
I hate most of j2ee stuf, but I use it. It because I need
Distributed,Persistent,Transactional and Secure Objects and I need
Cc:
Subject: Re: Db bean issue
jakarta-turbine-torque
john mcnally
Jason R Lee wrote:
Hello anyone who's out there,
I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get
anyones take on it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a
kinda jakarta proj/framework like
Hi,
We are working on simplestore in commons, it kind of Transparent Persitence
ARMI is kind of Transparent RPC, I work on integration for both projects.
You can get the firs release of complete framework on sourceforge EOB.
I am going to work on security and transaction then persitence in
Jason,
Juozas is indeed glueing the exellent SimpleStore library into one or
more of the examples for EOB. One small correction it is AltRMI not ARMI
that is the underlying RMI-less transport:
SimpleStore :
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/simplestore/
AltRMI :
sent earlier.
Thanks to all
-Original Message-
From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 3/11/2002 2:59 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Cc:
Subject: Re: Db bean issue
jakarta-turbine-torque
john mcnally
Jason R Lee wrote:
Hello anyone who's out there,
I
and I look forward to further discussions
on this subject.
thanks,
jason
-Original Message-
From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 3/12/2002 7:52 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Cc:
Subject:Re: Db bean issue
Hi,
I tried a lot of persitence
Jason R Lee wrote:
Ya, I guess turbine is more of a 'struts for the back end' so maybe i need to narrow
my approache or view like you're saying.
I'm not sure what to make of this statement. Turbine is a
web-application framework and contains code useful for presentation as
well as
Commons Developers List
Cc:
Subject:Re: Db bean issue
Jason R Lee wrote:
Ya, I guess turbine is more of a 'struts for the back end' so maybe i need to narrow
my approache or view like you're saying.
I'm not sure what to make of this statement. Turbine is a
web-application
Hello anyone who's out there,
I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on
it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta
proj/framework like struts, but addresses the back end.
I know, there's EJB, etc... But, after working on
Try this:
http://netmeme.org/simper
Bryan
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 15:20, Jason R Lee wrote:
Hello anyone who's out there,
I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on
it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta
jakarta-turbine-torque
john mcnally
Jason R Lee wrote:
Hello anyone who's out there,
I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on
it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta
proj/framework like struts, but addresses
:
Subject:Re: Db bean issue
jakarta-turbine-torque
john mcnally
Jason R Lee wrote:
Hello anyone who's out there,
I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on
it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta
proj/framework
12 matches
Mail list logo