Re: Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread Juozas Baliuka
Hi, I tried simper, I think it is good idea for web applications, It must be stable, because it very simple. But I need more complex in my projects, EJB too complex :(. I hate most of j2ee stuf, but I use it. It because I need Distributed,Persistent,Transactional and Secure Objects and I need

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread Juozas Baliuka
Cc: Subject: Re: Db bean issue jakarta-turbine-torque john mcnally Jason R Lee wrote: Hello anyone who's out there, I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework like

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread baliuka
Hi, We are working on simplestore in commons, it kind of Transparent Persitence ARMI is kind of Transparent RPC, I work on integration for both projects. You can get the firs release of complete framework on sourceforge EOB. I am going to work on security and transaction then persitence in

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread Paul Hammant
Jason, Juozas is indeed glueing the exellent SimpleStore library into one or more of the examples for EOB. One small correction it is AltRMI not ARMI that is the underlying RMI-less transport: SimpleStore : http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/simplestore/ AltRMI :

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread Andrus Adamchik
sent earlier. Thanks to all -Original Message- From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 3/11/2002 2:59 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Cc: Subject: Re: Db bean issue jakarta-turbine-torque john mcnally Jason R Lee wrote: Hello anyone who's out there, I

RE: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread Jason R Lee
and I look forward to further discussions on this subject. thanks, jason -Original Message- From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 3/12/2002 7:52 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Cc: Subject:Re: Db bean issue Hi, I tried a lot of persitence

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread John McNally
Jason R Lee wrote: Ya, I guess turbine is more of a 'struts for the back end' so maybe i need to narrow my approache or view like you're saying. I'm not sure what to make of this statement. Turbine is a web-application framework and contains code useful for presentation as well as

RE: Db bean issue

2002-03-12 Thread Jason R Lee
Commons Developers List Cc: Subject:Re: Db bean issue Jason R Lee wrote: Ya, I guess turbine is more of a 'struts for the back end' so maybe i need to narrow my approache or view like you're saying. I'm not sure what to make of this statement. Turbine is a web-application

Db bean issue

2002-03-11 Thread Jason R Lee
Hello anyone who's out there, I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework like struts, but addresses the back end. I know, there's EJB, etc... But, after working on

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-11 Thread Bryan Field-Elliot
Try this: http://netmeme.org/simper Bryan On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 15:20, Jason R Lee wrote: Hello anyone who's out there, I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta

Re: Db bean issue

2002-03-11 Thread John McNally
jakarta-turbine-torque john mcnally Jason R Lee wrote: Hello anyone who's out there, I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework like struts, but addresses

RE: Db bean issue

2002-03-11 Thread Jason R Lee
: Subject:Re: Db bean issue jakarta-turbine-torque john mcnally Jason R Lee wrote: Hello anyone who's out there, I have an 'issue' that is rearing its head again and wld like to get anyones take on it. It concerns beans db and the lack (or maybe not) of a kinda jakarta proj/framework