Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/2/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:16 +1100, Dion Gillard wrote:
Carlos, I think we the developers should work with you on this one.
+1
probably more effective that way
but i'm comfortable about proposing c
SNAPSHOT is a reserved word used by maven. When you deploy an artifact
whose version has the word SNAPSHOT it gets automatically deployed
also as a dated version, eg. 1.0-SNAPSHOT gets deployed as
1.0-20051115.203021.
About the javadoc dependency, the patch is wrong, shouldn't be
commented. In the
On 11/8/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About adding SNAPSHOT the reason is the same as other people has
> already given. I looked in the properties files and tried to guess the
> right version which is currently in development, other people will
> know better than me. The rule is i
About adding SNAPSHOT the reason is the same as other people has
already given. I looked in the properties files and tried to guess the
right version which is currently in development, other people will
know better than me. The rule is if last version released was 1.0 it
should be 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT, u
Hi Dion,
Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 1:28 PM:
> On 11/8/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM:
>>
>>> Questions:
>>
>> As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a
>> final version should never be ava
On 11/8/05, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/8/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM:
> >
> > > Questions:
> >
> > As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a final
> > version should never be available as l
On 11/8/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM:
>
> > Questions:
>
> As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a final
> version should never be available as latest trunk revision. Such a version
> may only be in the POM whe
Dion Gillard wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:11 PM:
> Questions:
As a general answer to the -SNAPSHOT: A POM with a final
version should never be available as latest trunk revision. Such a version may
only be in the POM when the release is cut and later immediately returned to a
snapsho
Questions:
1) The javadoc dependency in attributes/compiler/project.xml has been
commented out. Why?
2) cli/project.xml has changed from current version 2.0 to 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Why?
3) codec/project.xml has changed from current version 1.3 to 1.4-SNAPSHOT. Why?
4) betwixt/project.xml has a change whi
Phil,
If you apply the patch, I'm happy to test Validator afterwards.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 8:46 PM
On 11/2/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:16 +1100, Dion Gil
On 11/2/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:16 +1100, Dion Gillard wrote:
> > Carlos, I think we the developers should work with you on this one.
>
> +1
>
> probably more effective that way
>
> but i'm comfortable about proposing commons karma for any exi
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:16 +1100, Dion Gillard wrote:
> Carlos, I think we the developers should work with you on this one.
+1
probably more effective that way
but i'm comfortable about proposing commons karma for any existing
apache committer who wants it.
- robert
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314
On 10/31/05, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Post away...
>
> On 11/1/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's 30KB. I haven't changed dependencies or anything related directly
> > to the projects and their functionali
Post away...
On 11/1/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's 30KB. I haven't changed dependencies or anything related directly
> to the projects and their functionality, mainly syntax fixes, that's
> why I took the responsability of doing it at a time instead of one at
> a time.
>
> I
It's 30KB. I haven't changed dependencies or anything related directly
to the projects and their functionality, mainly syntax fixes, that's
why I took the responsability of doing it at a time instead of one at
a time.
I can send the patch if you think is not too big for the mailing list.
On 10/31
Carlos, I think we the developers should work with you on this one.
Post the patch as an attachment here so we can all look at it. How big is it?
On 11/1/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on fixing the maven project.xml files so they work
> with maven 1.1 t
Hi,
I've been working on fixing the maven project.xml files so they work
with maven 1.1 too and to improve the future releases and possible
upgrade to maven 2.
I don't have rights in the commons svn, so I'd like to know if you
prefer a patch for everything as a bugzilla issue, separated patches
(
17 matches
Mail list logo
