RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-29 Thread Marc Saegesser
ate. Marc Saegesser > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 7:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient > > > Marc, > > > Okay, Okay, I give up. I'

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-29 Thread ringo . desmet
Marc, > Okay, Okay, I give up. I'll get rid of the 1.3 specific > calls. The reason > they got used in the first place was because the JavaDoc for the > java.net.URL class doesn't have an @since tag for the methods > that got added > in 1.3. > > Add this to list of issues to be resolved prior t

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-29 Thread Marc Saegesser
al release. Marc Saegesser > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient > > > Hello Costin, > > > Sorry for

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-29 Thread ringo . desmet
Hello Costin, > Sorry for giving this impression - I usually advocate > maintaining JDK1.1 > compatibility whenever is possible, and at least at the API > level ( with > anything up to 1.4 in the implementation, as long as the > feature can also > be implemented in 1.1 ). I'll stand next to you

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-28 Thread ringo . desmet
Hello Otis, > There is also a HTTPClient library at www.innovation.ch somewhere that > probably works with JDK 1.2.2 that you may want to use, instead of > hacking Jakarta's HTTP Client to support that version of JDK. Hacking? My impression is that the usage of the two methods from JDK 1.3 in th

RE: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-28 Thread costinm
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > > JDK1.2.2 is old and is not worth supporting, but the new > > GCJ3.0 and J2ME ( > > The statement above gives me the impression that the author is working in an > environment where he can set the platform (development and/or deploymen

Re: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-27 Thread otisg
Saegesser > Sent: 3/28/2002 12:46:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Minimum JDK version for HttpClient > > I realized recently that there is code in HttpClient that requires JDK 1.3, > namely URL.getPath() and URL.getQuery(). The JavaDoc doesn't indicate it, > but t

Minimum JDK version for HttpClient

2002-03-27 Thread Marc Saegesser
I realized recently that there is code in HttpClient that requires JDK 1.3, namely URL.getPath() and URL.getQuery(). The JavaDoc doesn't indicate it, but these methods got added in JDK 1.3. Is there any reason we can't live with this? Is support JDK 1.2.2 a requirement? Neither of these method