gester (as a concept; like logging) would be a subproject within XML
(not a TLP), since it's XML-specific.
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 5:51 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [Digester] Ques
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 17:11 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> Just make sure you use the apache license!
+1
use version 2 :)
> I think the idea/concept of
> Digester is big enough to merit a TLP (or group of them). And, since it's
> an XML-specific technology, I think it belongs within the XML gr
--Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 4:46 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [Digester] Question about ports
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 13:11 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> [Aargh - I hate top-posting!]
&g
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 13:11 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> [Aargh - I hate top-posting!]
>
> If someone wants to move Digester to Apache XML, I wouldn't object.
> However I don't feel particularly motivated to do it myself.
xml is now a federation of top level projects. IMHO digester isn't big
en
---Original Message-
> From: Silas Snider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 11:49 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Digester] Question about ports
>
> As I am also planning on porting it to Ruby, should I bother? Or should
>
2005 11:49 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Digester] Question about ports
As I am also planning on porting it to Ruby, should I bother? Or should
I just open my own (say) sourceforge project? Only reason I'm asking is
that I have never participated in apache devlopment bef
As I am also planning on porting it to Ruby, should I bother? Or should
I just open my own (say) sourceforge project? Only reason I'm asking is
that I have never participated in apache devlopment before, so I don't
know what the accepted community norms are, etc.
Sincerely,
Silas Snider
James Car
It could possibly be argued that Digester belongs in Apache XML. There
could probably be different "flavors" of it (a la Xerces) like DigesterJ,
Digesterl (digester/perl), or Digesterthon (digester/python). Of course,
those are horrible names (except for maybe DigesterJ), but you get the
point.
