On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:12 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> ---
> [X] +1 I support creating [collection-functors]
> [ ] +0 It's OK
> [ ] +1 If you must
> [ ] -1 I don't support this because
> ---
- robert
-
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:17 -0500, Michael Heuer wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:09 +, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > > +1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called
> > > collections-functors).
> > >
> > > Rational:
> > > I think functors ar
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:09 +, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > +1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called
> > collections-functors).
> >
> > Rational:
> > I think functors are a powerful approach to software design, under
> > represented (in jav
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:09 +, Tim Roberts wrote:
> +1 I support creating a functors library (but not necessarily called
> collections-functors).
>
> Rational:
> I think functors are a powerful approach to software design, under
> represented (in java) and non-standardised. I would like to se
source community stuff so apologies for any
mistakes/inappropriate actions (such as voting on this change).
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2005 01:13
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New commons proper compone
ch as voting on this change).
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2005 01:13
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors
Reissued ballot paper as I can't
On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new component is [collection-functors], so there
> should be no confusion.
Ok, you're right, that would be clear.
> I do expect different release cycles going forward.
> There is only a small tie between the two bits of code
> (4 in
--- Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TransformerUtils -> [collection-functors]
> > PredicateUtils -> [collection-functors]
> > ClosureUtils -> [collection-functors]
> > FactoryUtils -> [collection-functors]
> >
> > Transfor
On 11/29/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
> > So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
> > Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
> > package or go into the new component?
>
> TransformerUtils ->
On 11/28/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
> > So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
> > Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
> > package or go into the new component?
>
> TransformerUtils ->
James Carman wrote:
So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
package or go into the new component?
TransformerUtils -> [collection-functors]
PredicateUtils -> [collection-functors]
ClosureUti
Reissued ballot paper as I can't use Ctrl+C...
---
[ ] +1 I support creating [collection-functors]
[ ] +0 It's OK
[ ] -0 If you must
[ ] -1 I don't support this because
---
Stephen
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The [collections] component would like to spli
So, TransformerUtils would have to move into the new component, right?
Would the Transformer, Closure, and Predicate interfaces stay in the core
package or go into the new component?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 6:1
On 11/28/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The [collections] component would like to split out a new commons proper
> component, [collection-functors]. This component will be created
> directly in commons proper, not the sandbox as it contains code
> previously released. The prima
James Carman: +1
Did you mean "-0 If you must"?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 6:12 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] New commons proper component - collections-functors
The [collections] compone
15 matches
Mail list logo
