Inline:
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 23:11
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [take 2]
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Ah, well, in that sprit
ame. Also, the last two examples should probably be
replaced by one using a * for the integer argument.
Phil
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 20:24
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Comm
August 25, 2003 20:24
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [take 2]
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I'll take the blame for causing any confusion on this one since I had
> > committed these Javadoc changes "during"
age-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 00:00
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [take 2]
Well, if there is a question about policy/process, why not just freeze
the
code and restart the vote?
By tagging
> In addition to the question of us playing it a bit more by the rules
Again, I never said that you weren't. I was only asking what they were
*here*. :-)
> I'd rather not do any deploys until the move from daedelus to minotaur is
complete
Makes sense.
--- Noel
--
+1.
(FYI, I am out Wednesday through Sunday or Monday, no email access).
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 14:25
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Commons L
t;
> If we want to implement a code freeze in our environment on top of using
> tags, we could do that. I guess we'd have to vote on it too :-)
>
> Gary
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, August
s, we could do that. I guess we'd have to vote on it too :-)
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 00:00
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [tak
> Well, if there is a question about policy/process, why not just freeze the
> code and restart the vote?
By tagging the CVS, he effectively has frozen the code for the Release. I
was simply curious about the policy because, as I said, other projects are
stricter. For example the HTTPd team has
--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a 2_0 tag on the CVS which represents the release material, so
> > continued development shouldn't affect that.
>
> > What I've been doing since the Thursday night tagging was to cvs tag
> the
> > javadoc-fixed files to 2_0 [after check
> There's a 2_0 tag on the CVS which represents the release material, so
> continued development shouldn't affect that.
> What I've been doing since the Thursday night tagging was to cvs tag the
> javadoc-fixed files to 2_0 [after checking the change was 'harmless'],
> but I know this is a bit of
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So, without further ado, I'll repeat my call for a VOTE last May.
>
> From what I'm reading, a release makes sense, but what is this group's
> policy regarding making changes during the vote? I know that
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, without further ado, I'll repeat my call for a VOTE last May.
>From what I'm reading, a release makes sense, but what is this group's
policy regarding making changes during the vote? I know that it is just a
bit of cleanup (a few wholely appropriate
+1
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
"One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 9:55 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Cc: Jaka
[x] +1 I support Commons Lang 2.0
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 07:55
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Cc: Jakarta Project Management Committee List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Commons Lang 2.0 [take 2]
>
>
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We've already called a vote on this back in May, but a -1 that wanted us
> to include Lang.time caused us to delay and since then we've been dealing
> with more minutae.
>
> So, without further ado, I'll repeat my call for
I've just done a pass to pretty up some Javadoc in .lang.builder and I
cannot see the need for the class StandardToStringStyle. It is not used at
all except in a unit test. All it does is call super on a bunch of accessors
and mutators (and changing these methods from protected to public). What is
Howdy,
+1, let's get it out the door... ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:55 AM
>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>Cc: Jakarta Project Management Committee List
>Subject: [VO
On Saturday, July 5, 2003, at 11:51 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
[X] +1 I support Commons Lang 2.0
[ ] +0 Huh? Sure, let me sleep.
[ ] -0 Lang? Sounds bad.
[ ] -1 I hate you guys.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
+1
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
"One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 5:52 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject:
"Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
+1
>+1
>> [ ] +1 I support Commons Lang 2.0
>> [ ] +0 Huh? Sure, let me sleep.
>> [ ] -0 Lang? Sounds bad.
>> [ ] -1 I hate you guys.
>>
>> [http://www.apache.org/~bayard/lang2.0/ contains a preliminary build
>> of 2.0 and the javadoc and
+1
> [ ] +1 I support Commons Lang 2.0
> [ ] +0 Huh? Sure, let me sleep.
> [ ] -0 Lang? Sounds bad.
> [ ] -1 I hate you guys.
>
> [http://www.apache.org/~bayard/lang2.0/ contains a preliminary build
> of 2.0 and the javadoc and javadiff]
>
> What's not going:
>
>
> lang.fu
Henri Yandell wrote:
> (Repeating myself from the previous occasion)
>
> Our t's are dotted and our i's are crossed, so we'd like to make a
> release of Commons Lang 2.0.
>
> [x] +epsilon (whatever my vote counts) I support Commons Lang 2.0
> [ ] +0 Huh? Sure, let me sleep.
> [ ] -0 L
+1
Gary
+1
I just made some Javadoc corrections.
Please add a release note to the effect that StringUtils chomp and chop
semantics have changed to more closely match Perl.
You might also mention the Entities class -- it's useful as an alternative
to StringEscapeUtils for HTML and XML.
Good work, Henri!
25 matches
Mail list logo
