On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 10:26 -0400, James Carman wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin suggested that I make it a proposal rather than a
> vote.
sorry - my advice didn't prove too good, i'm afraid :-/
i've been busy and your proposal got buried in loads of general commons
emails. (need to add another
Oh, but thank you very much for offering to help, though. If I run into any
more snags, I might take you up on it! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:22 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [all] Maven
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:22 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [all] Maven 1.0 vs. 2.0
James Carman wrote:
> All,
>
> What's the standard build system for Jakarta Commons right now? I know
> folks have been trying to move to M2, but is it stabl
n den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:07 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [all] Maven 1.0 vs. 2.0
I have a vote in my mailbox somewhere about a move of proxy, but I never saw
a vote result, so by
this I assume the vote never passed or have not rec
James Carman wrote:
All,
What's the standard build system for Jakarta Commons right now? I know
folks have been trying to move to M2, but is it stable enough and does it
support all we need currently (like sshdeploy and the like)? I'd like to
move Commons Proxy to the proper, but my M2 build i
I have a vote in my mailbox somewhere about a move of proxy, but I never saw a vote result, so by
this I assume the vote never passed or have not received the vote result. Any pointers ?
Mvgr,
Martin
James Carman wrote:
All,
What's the standard build system for Jakarta Commons right now? I k
