Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
> > > > This turned out to be a bug in the site.jsl. A patch has been applied > to svn and this will be fixed in version 1.10 of the xdoc plugin. > Here is an example site generated using the patched plugin and > maven.xdoc.theme=classic > maven.ui.banner.background=#fff > > http://people.apache.or

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-26 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/12/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/12/05, Niall Pemberton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > They do, but including the commons "about us" menu before the component's > > menu is in the commons-site.jsl > > > > commons-site.js

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/12/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > They do, but including the commons "about us" menu before the component's > menu is in the commons-site.jsl > > commons-site.jsl has the following line: > > > > but site.jsl (from 1.9.2) has

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On 9/11/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 2:36 AM >> >> > > I think this option I raised earlier got missed, so I'll repeat here:

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/11/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 2:36 AM > > > > I think this option I raised earlier got missed, so I'll repeat here: > > > > The one option I'd consider is wheth

RE: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
I opened a new bug for this incompatibility issue. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPXDOC-167 Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : lundi 12 septembre 2005 06:14 > À : Jakarta Commons Developers List > Objet : Re:

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
- Original Message - From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 2:36 AM > I think this option I raised earlier got missed, so I'll repeat here: > > The one option I'd consider is whether it is worth ditching > commons-site.jsl altogether. I have no idea wha

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Brett Porter
>We have Subversion now, and so svn:externals, which gives us an alternative >to having to check out commons-build separately... > > This still has 2 problems: - you end up with X checkouts of commons-build where X is the number of projects in commons you have checked out - You also have to do

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Martin Cooper
On 9/11/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/11/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > > > >Given the current setup above, unless I am missing something, all of > > the > > > >maven.xml's would

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
- Original Message - From: "Phil Steitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 9/11/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I did a quick scan and only "attributes" and "chain" extend the >> commons-build/project.xml - but maybe all commons components should? > That used to be the setup, a

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/11/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > >Given the current setup above, unless I am missing something, all of > the > > >maven.xml's would have to be modified to check, I guess this is > possible. > > > >

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Phil Steitz wrote: > > >Given the current setup above, unless I am missing something, all of the > >maven.xml's would have to be modified to check, I guess this is possible. > > > > > Fair enough - I thought all the projects extended > commons-build/projec

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Brett Porter
Phil Steitz wrote: >Given the current setup above, unless I am missing something, all of the >maven.xml's would have to be modified to check, I guess this is possible. > > Fair enough - I thought all the projects extended commons-build/project.xml (and hence used it's maven.xml). >Is there any

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/11/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Phil. > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > >There does not appear to be a reasonable way to make our customized > >site.jslwork with both pre- and post- > >1.9 versions of the maven xdoc plugin. The best solution is to upgrade to > >1.9+ before ge

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Phil. Phil Steitz wrote: >There does not appear to be a reasonable way to make our customized >site.jslwork with both pre- and post- >1.9 versions of the maven xdoc plugin. The best solution is to upgrade to >1.9+ before generating commons sites. I also just fixed a problem in >commons-site.

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-11 Thread Phil Steitz
There does not appear to be a reasonable way to make our customized site.jslwork with both pre- and post- 1.9 versions of the maven xdoc plugin. The best solution is to upgrade to 1.9+ before generating commons sites. I also just fixed a problem in commons-site.jsl that we preventing the date bei

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-10 Thread Phil Steitz
Sorry guys, I made the jsl change, which was to make site builds work with versions 1.9+ of the xdoc plugin. I thought I had tested successfully with 1.8, but now see that I must have failed to clear the plugin cache or something. My bad. So...current state is that commons-site.jsl *requires* v.

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
The problem is the update that was made to "commons-site.jsl" 9 days ago: http://tinyurl.com/dvab5 If you reverse out that change the problem goes away. Niall - Original Message - From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 10:52 PM It seems this maven prob

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-09 Thread Don Brown
tjdo-plugin-1.0.0 > maven-uberjar-plugin-1.2 > maven-vdoclet-plugin-1.2 > maven-war-plugin-1.6.1 > maven-webserver-plugin-2.0 > maven-wizard-plugin-1.1 > maven-xdoc-plugin-1.8 > > -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday

RE: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-09 Thread James Carman
opers List Subject: Re: [commons-build] Site build problem Didn't help. Besides, I thought Maven would download plugins automatically from the network. By "upgrading", I downloaded the 1.5 jar and put it in my maven home /plugins directory. Any other ideas? Don On 9/9/05,

Re: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-09 Thread Don Brown
Didn't help. Besides, I thought Maven would download plugins automatically from the network. By "upgrading", I downloaded the 1.5 jar and put it in my maven home /plugins directory. Any other ideas? Don On 9/9/05, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had to upgrade one of the maven pl

RE: [commons-build] Site build problem

2005-09-09 Thread James Carman
I had to upgrade one of the maven plugins to fix that, I believe. Which version of the jdepend plugin do you have? I'm at version 1.5. I'm not absolutely sure that's the plugin that I upgraded. -Original Message- From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 09, 200