Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

I had a short glance at your code (not much time ATM). This seems to be similar to my own ideas. Comments inline. Emmanuel Bourg wrote: [snip] - a ConfigurationNode interface is introduced, it's an abstract node with basic navigation methods like getElements(), createNode(), getName(). Its

RE: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

List Subject: Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly? Hmm, navigating through a tree based on a configuration key, creating missing nodes if necessary and finally storing the value... Similar code is contained in HierarchicalConfiguration and I suppose

Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

basic for me.. Eric -Original Message- From: Oliver Heger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:49 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly? Hmm, navigating through a tree based

Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

Oliver Heger wrote: Hmm, navigating through a tree based on a configuration key, creating missing nodes if necessary and finally storing the value... Similar code is contained in HierarchicalConfiguration and I suppose in XMLConfiguration, too, to update the internally used DOM tree. I wonder

Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly? Eric Pugh wrote: Anyone have a good reason whe JNDIConfiguration doesn't support setting properties? I was thinking of going for just a simple string storing of properties, not binding in Datasources or anything funky like that... Eric How

Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

Eric Pugh wrote: Anyone have a good reason whe JNDIConfiguration doesn't support setting properties? I was thinking of going for just a simple string storing of properties, not binding in Datasources or anything funky like that... Eric How to you plan to implement this ? By playing with the

RE: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

to save in a temporary storage because I want to be able to persist via JNDI configuration changes. Eric -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 5:54 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [configuration] Any reason

Re: [configuration] Any reason why JNDIConfiguration is readonly?

Eric Pugh wrote: Well.. I started on the bind/rebind stuff. and am having a really hard time of it... I can bind a property like this newprop just fine.. However, a property like my.newprop fails.. I think I need to crawl the tree and find the correct context and then set that... argh..