On 5 Apr 2004, at 00:42, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 08:37, robert burrell donkin wrote:
as far as i'm concerned the major issue with a 1.6 is (and has been
for
a while) finding a release manager. craig and i have different views
on
who's eligible for this role. you might prefer
Robert,
Why not try to get on the PMC so you can feel ok about managing releases?
You do a lot of work around here so I find it hard to believe you wouldn't
be welcome on the PMC :-).
David
--- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5 Apr 2004, at 00:42, Simon Kitching wrote:
On
On 6 Apr 2004, at 21:01, David Graham wrote:
Robert,
Why not try to get on the PMC so you can feel ok about managing
releases?
You do a lot of work around here so I find it hard to believe you
wouldn't
be welcome on the PMC :-).
i resigned :)
i don't have any plans to rejoin (at least whilst
On 1 Apr 2004, at 07:23, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 10:55, Edelson, Justin wrote:
snip
Just to be clear, is there a timeframe for 1.6?
I am *very* keen to get a release out the door within 4 weeks.
Unfortunately, people keep coming up with really cool features to
include :-).
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 08:37, robert burrell donkin wrote:
as far as i'm concerned the major issue with a 1.6 is (and has been for
a while) finding a release manager. craig and i have different views on
who's eligible for this role. you might prefer craig's view's to mine
in this case.
I
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 10:55, Edelson, Justin wrote:
Simon - Sorry I haven't had a chance to respond to your email. I was
actually more concentrating on answering your question about use-cases,
but it sounds like I don't need to sell this need as much as I thought I
did (at least for now).
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 18:23, Simon Kitching wrote:
Attached is a working solution based on my original proposal. It is
integrated into Digester rather than being a subclass. I think the
changes are simple enough, and performance impact low enough, that
integrating this into the mainline is ok.
Simon - Sorry I haven't had a chance to respond to your email. I was
actually more concentrating on answering your question about use-cases,
but it sounds like I don't need to sell this need as much as I thought I
did (at least for now).
If someone (eg Justin) is keen to work on this now, we
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 12:01, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 04:36, Edelson, Justin wrote:
Since coding these changes, I've rethought whether or not this needs to
be a subclass - since @text() can't be a legal XML element, existing
code shouldn't be affected. After starting to
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 04:36, Edelson, Justin wrote:
Since coding these changes, I've rethought whether or not this needs to
be a subclass - since @text() can't be a legal XML element, existing
code shouldn't be affected. After starting to duplicate all of the
existing Digester test cases to
of normalized)...
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 3/23/2004 2:23 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Cc:
Subject: RE: [digester] mixed content update
Justin
11 matches
Mail list logo
