I know for Jelly when I've rebuilt the site, I've never checked it in to
CVS.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/11/2003 03:55:47 PM:
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do
Is this a definite rule?
Is there somewhere it's mandated?
I'm asking as I don't remember it being required.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/11/2003 02:29:18 PM:
I assume you are talking
Ditto. But in the case of Latka and HttpClient, I expect anything checked
into CVS to be using CVS.
Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be
something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs
enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess
On 18 Nov 2003, at 04:55, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist
in
CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in
CVS be removed?
As far as I know, they should all be checked into CVS, regardless of
whether
they are
Noel wrote:
As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out
into
the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that
infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem. This
includes sites generated by Forrest or Maven.
Martin Cooper wrote:
Still need to sort them out. The HttpClient cvs diffs could just be
something daft like a bad line ending, but if so then it's confusing cvs
enough to suggest everything is different. I'll mess around with the -b
options to diff etc to see if it's just dos/unix formatting.
The HttpClient docs in
Anyone from Latka got a clue what's screwed up with their docs/CVS?
Lots of clashes if I attempt to cvs update those.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm just waiting for a definitive answer from infrastructure,
or whomever else wants to make the official judgment.
Unless infrastructure replies otherwise to the e-mail I sent this morning, I
think you should assume that the currently posted policy stands.
--- Noel
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/11/2003 04:52:48 AM:
Noel wrote:
As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out
into
the file system. Amongst the reasons for this are to ensure that
infrastructure can recover them rapidly in the event of a problem.
Local changes to dbcp.html and pool.html can be removed.
The cvs version is correct.
-- Dirk
Henri Yandell wrote:
There are some problems on the Commons site cvs-wise at the moment.
dbcp.html and pool.html have been edited locally.
httpclient/ has also been edited locally.
These will get merges
Closer looking showed that these files had already been updated with cvs
clashes. I've reset them to the local cvs.
Thanks,
Hen
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Dirk Verbeeck wrote:
Local changes to dbcp.html and pool.html can be removed.
The cvs version is correct.
-- Dirk
Henri Yandell wrote:
Hen,
I assume you are talking about the docs at
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is
not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with
maven site:deploy. What are you planning to do with the docs here?
Mike
On Nov 16, 2003, at 11:58 PM,
They are however in CVS, so if we do a cvs update it'll change those
files.
cvs server: Updating httpclient
M httpclient/applications.html
M httpclient/downloads.html
M httpclient/features.html
M httpclient/index.html
M httpclient/news.html
M httpclient/overview.html
M httpclient/proposal.html
M
I assume you are talking about the docs at
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/. The HttpClient site is
not maintained in CVS. It is generated via Maven and published with
maven site:deploy.
As far as I know, all sites are supposed to be in CVS, and checked out into
the file system.
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in
CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in
CVS be removed?
Mike
On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I assume you are talking about the docs at
Do you suggest removing the HttpClient docs from CVS?
Mike
On Nov 17, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
They are however in CVS, so if we do a cvs update it'll change those
files.
cvs server: Updating httpclient
M httpclient/applications.html
M httpclient/downloads.html
M
It seems there are a large number of commons sites that do not exist in
CVS. Is there a standard for this? Should the HttpClient entries in
CVS be removed?
As far as I know, they should all be checked into CVS, regardless of whether
they are built with anakia, forrest or maven.
---
Any thoughts?
You want my view? As a matter of policy, changes that are not in CVS should
not be considered changes. If you care to be nice, you could do cvs diff -u
and e-mail the diff to the list before you blow the renegade file(s) away.
--- Noel
18 matches
Mail list logo
