RE: Lang 2.0 Scope Was: [lang] scope for version 2

2003-02-03 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello Allm About: org.apache.commons.lang.functor.* Functor interfaces, grown from initial versions in Collections and Patterns. Does the introduction of this new package mean that Commons Collection will depend on Commons Lang, if not, why not? It would seem to me that creating such a

RE: Lang 2.0 Scope Was: [lang] scope for version 2

2003-02-03 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Gary Gregory wrote: Hello Allm About: org.apache.commons.lang.functor.* Functor interfaces, grown from initial versions in Collections and Patterns. Does the introduction of this new package mean that Commons Collection will depend on Commons Lang, if not, why

Re: Lang 2.0 Scope Was: [lang] scope for version 2

2003-02-02 Thread Stephen Colebourne
And IdentiferUtils must be decided on too. Stephen - Original Message - From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:18 AM Subject: Lang 2.0 Scope Was: [lang] scope for version 2 Any arguments with this?

Re: Lang 2.0 Scope Was: [lang] scope for version 2

2003-02-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry. Missed that. I'd intended that to go down as being in the scope for 2.0 along with the other util/ packages. Hen On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote: And IdentiferUtils must be decided on too. Stephen - Original Message - From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: