prefer keeping all new primitives
> > stuff together and focussing [lang] more on Objects.
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Jakarta Commons Dev
Here's an example of the current state:
MutableInteger
// from Mutable
void setValue(Object)
Object getValue()
// from MutableNumber
Number getNumber()
void setNumber(Number)
// Subclass specific
setValue(int)
I was assuming that w
Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
> > "One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them..."
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: __matthewHawthorne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:36 PM
> > &g
-
From: "Steven Caswell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:02 AM
Subject: RE: Mutables Was: [lang] TODO for 2.1
> I'm still not comfortable with primitive. Yo
> From: __matthewHawthorne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:36 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Mutables Was: [lang] TODO for 2.1
> >
> >
> > Are we now in agreement about the features for mutable
velopers List
> Subject: Re: Mutables Was: [lang] TODO for 2.1
>
>
> Are we now in agreement about the features for mutable
> numbers? If so,
> I can update my submission with what we've discussed, and
> resubmit the
> enhancement to [primitives] instead of
+0.8 ;-)
you might want to list the full API for MutableInteger just to be
sure...mine below:
On Mutable (interface):
setValue(Object)
getValue()
On MutableNumber (interface):
getNumber()
setNumber(Number)
shortNumber() - maybe only on implementation?
getShortValue() - synonm for JavaBean tools
s
Are we now in agreement about the features for mutable numbers? If so,
I can update my submission with what we've discussed, and resubmit the
enhancement to [primitives] instead of [lang].
The primary changes are:
- Addition of Mutable interface
Mutable
setValue(Object)
Object getValue(
rta Commons Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mutables Was: [lang] TODO for 2.1
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> > > > *) Should the MXxxx decorate an Xxxx or an . [ie
> primitive or
> > >
> *) Is a .mutable subpackage okay?
> > I prefer lang.math
>
> Boolean? Byte? String? None of these belong in lang.math.
You're right... I've never really used bytes, so I wasn't sure where
they would fall. I didn't create a mutable boolean since someone
suggested otherwise, but if others think
10 matches
Mail list logo
