Re: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-24 Thread Daniel Rall
Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [question] > I'm considering the authors to be Colebourne and Downey. So I need some > nods from Daniel and Caswell. Also Ola Berg and Scott Sanders if they've > been focusing on them at all. Sounds right to me. > [question] > Is there anything not in

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-20 Thread Scott Sanders
> [question] > I'm considering the authors to be Colebourne and Downey. So I > need some nods from Daniel and Caswell. Also Ola Berg and > Scott Sanders if they've been focusing on them at all. I have taken a look, and I like what I see. Let's go with this. > [question] > Is there anything no

Re: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-19 Thread Stephen Colebourne
> The builders look good. I was able to subclass ToStringStyle to get > customized formatting, which was my chief concern. I do think the > javadocs for the ToStringBuilder and associated classes should be > expanded to make it easier to implement custom formatting, without > someone needing to wa

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-19 Thread Steven Caswell
ommons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs > > > Exactly. commons proper [god that needs a better name]. > > Everything in commons proper should already have gone through > the process of being happy that it is in the

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-18 Thread Steven Caswell
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 6:14 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs > > > > [question] > > Is there any

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-18 Thread Scott Sanders
> [question] > Is there anything not in commons proper which people believe > is highly important to get in there before a 1.0 release?? > The most important thing that is missing for the 1.0 release is the 1.0 release. :) Scott -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For addi

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Exactly. commons proper [god that needs a better name]. Everything in commons proper should already have gone through the process of being happy that it is in the right package, and not a potential util or beanutil or collection or pattern or whatnot. I've not been focusing on builder/ and System

RE: Release (1) Re: [lang] Added a couple of TODOs

2002-09-18 Thread Steven Caswell
By "everything" I assume you mean everything in commons proper and not in the sandbox. I haven't seen anything I object to, though I haven't looked it all over in great detail. The more the merrier. I want to work on CalendarUtils but just haven't have the bandwidth yet, and I don't want to hold