Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-07 Thread C. Grobmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > You've got my time if you need it. Push on with getting each one of > these moving, and whenever you hit a karma issue, just hit me and I'll > deal with patches etc. > > I'll try to find time to dig into the issues themselves, but far more > realist

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/6/06, C. Grobmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > What would be the work involved in getting compress released? Any idea? > > - - fixing the 3 (or 4) Bugs > - - preparing an commonly used interface > - - having functions for deleting files fr

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-06 Thread C. Grobmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > What would be the work involved in getting compress released? Any idea? - - fixing the 3 (or 4) Bugs - - preparing an commonly used interface - - having functions for deleting files from a compressed file (optional, i think) - - clean up of the old

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/6/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > >>> I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will > > >> never see

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-06 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > >>> I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over. > >>> > >>> > >> Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will > >> never see a vfs release :-( > >> > > Is there something that stops a VFS 1.0

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-06 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! >>> I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over. >>> >>> >> Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will >> never see a vfs release :-( >> > Is there something that stops a VFS 1.0 with the rest of > the providers (without these three)? Su

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-06 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 3/5/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now what happend? I was frustrated, and this feeling is still alive. Not > only due to the fact that this is not allowed, but also while it took so > long time to appear. > I understand some frustration that it look so many RCs to surface,

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-05 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! > I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over. > Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will never see a vfs release :-( --- Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-05 Thread Dion Gillard
I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over. On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Brett! > >> Now what happend? I was frustrated, and this feeling is still alive. > Not > >> only due to the fact that this is not allowed, but also while it took > so > >> lo

Re: commons-vfs release

2006-03-05 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Brett! >> Now what happend? I was frustrated, and this feeling is still alive. Not >> only due to the fact that this is not allowed, but also while it took so >> long time to appear. >> > > Can you remind me why you don't just svn copy the sources you need from > these components into commo

Re: commons-vfs release (was: Problems...)

2006-03-05 Thread Brett Porter
Mario Ivankovits wrote: > Now what happend? I was frustrated, and this feeling is still alive. Not > only due to the fact that this is not allowed, but also while it took so > long time to appear. Can you remind me why you don't just svn copy the sources you need from these components into commons