Re: What should we do about sandbox ? RE: License and copyright issues

2002-10-23 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On 10/22/02 12:01 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Cooper wrote: > >> I found a few things not yet mentioned: >> >> 1) In codec\Metaphone.java, "Copyright 1997, William B. Brogden", which is >> clearly a problem. >> >> 2) In scaffold, numerous instances of "Copyright (

Re: What should we do about sandbox ? RE: License and copyright issues

2002-10-22 Thread Richard Sitze
I like playing in the sandbox, I just don't like to be unpleasantly surprised on what I find buried within. I can see both sides, but it does appear to be IMPERATIVE that the catbox... err sandbox be kept clean for visitors. We simply cannot become, or even appear to become, a public reposito

Re: What should we do about sandbox ? RE: License and copyright issues

2002-10-21 Thread Michael A. Smith
Costin Manolache wrote: Martin Cooper wrote: I found a few things not yet mentioned: 1) In codec\Metaphone.java, "Copyright 1997, William B. Brogden", which is clearly a problem. 2) In scaffold, numerous instances of "Copyright (c) 2002 Synthis Corporation.", also clearly a problem. Acordi

RE: What should we do about sandbox ? RE: License and copyright issues

2002-10-21 Thread Adrian Sutton
>I would propose to ask the sandbox to be removed from viewcvs >and the eventually discuss what to do about the public cvs. >As a way to protect ourself. I wouldn't mind if this is voted >down :-) > >What do you think about this issue ? Any other proposed solutions ? As a non-committer, I'd have t

What should we do about sandbox ? RE: License and copyright issues

2002-10-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Martin Cooper wrote: > I found a few things not yet mentioned: > > 1) In codec\Metaphone.java, "Copyright 1997, William B. Brogden", which is > clearly a problem. > > 2) In scaffold, numerous instances of "Copyright (c) 2002 Synthis > Corporation.", also clearly a problem. Acording to jakarta-c