Re: 2.0 release - looking to the future

2003-06-29 Thread Michael Becke
All good ideas I think. I agree with the separation for 2.1/3.0. I have one item to add to the 2.1 release. I would like to rework the HttpConnectionManagers to add support for connection factories and perhaps a few other things. In particular I would like to move the creation of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21130] - Make MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager defaults public statics.

2003-06-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21130. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: 2.0 release - looking to the future

2003-06-29 Thread Michael Becke
On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 05:45 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Mike, It does sound like a good idea to me, but could not it wait until 3.0, as it does seem to be exactly what Eric has been proposing as a framework of interfaces? It might fall within the framework of interfaces idea. My

Re: 2.0 release - looking to the future

2003-06-29 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Sounds like a plan. BTW, I think we should release current CVS snapshot as BETA-2. If my memory does not fail me, we have not had a single new 'confirmed' bug for over two weeks or even more. I suggest we call it a release. I am off to bed. Talk to you tomorrow Oleg On Mon, 2003-06-30 at

Re: 2.0 release - looking to the future

2003-06-29 Thread Michael Becke
Agreed. I will call for a beta-2 release shortly. Mike On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 06:28 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: Sounds like a plan. BTW, I think we should release current CVS snapshot as BETA-2. If my memory does not fail me, we have not had a single new 'confirmed' bug for over two

[VOTE] 2.0 beta2 release

2003-06-29 Thread Michael Becke
I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS as beta2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: -- Vote: HttpClient 2.0 beta 2 release [] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it. [ ] +0 I

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 beta2 release

2003-06-29 Thread Michael Becke
+1 for me. Mike On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 06:54 PM, Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS as beta2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: --- --- Vote: HttpClient 2.0 beta 2

Re: [VOTE] 2.0 beta2 release

2003-06-29 Thread Adrian Sutton
+1 On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 08:54 AM, Michael Becke wrote: I propose that we mark the latest code in CVS as beta2 and proceed with a release. Please vote as follows: --- --- Vote: HttpClient 2.0 beta 2 release [] +1